DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...60
Hits 1 – 20 of 1.188

1
Can Exams Change How and What Teachers Teach? Investigating the Washback Effect of a University English Language Proficiency Test in the Turkish Context
In: Volume: 4, Issue: 2 155-176 ; 2149-1135 (2018)
BASE
Show details
2
Elementary principal leadership and learning outcomes for low socioeconomic status Hispanic English learners
Moshayedi, Sahar Naz. - : University of Southern California Digital Library (USC.DL), 2018
BASE
Show details
3
Can exams change how and what teachers teach? investigating the washback effect of a university english language proficiency test in the turkish context
Sağlam, Aslı Lidice Göktürk. - : Hacettepe University, 2018
BASE
Show details
4
‘Back to the future’: The ‘new prescriptivism’ in twenty-first-century Britain
BEAL, Joan C.. - : Laboratoire d’Études et de Recherche sur le Monde Anglophone, 2018. : E-rea, 2018
BASE
Show details
5
The Video Head Impulse Test
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2018)
BASE
Show details
6
Development of the Polish Speech Test Signal and its Comparison with the International Speech Test Signal
Habasińska Dorota; Skrodzka Ewa; Bogusz-Witczak Edyta. - : Committee on Acoustics PAS, PAS Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Acoustical Society, 2018
BASE
Show details
7
Лексические показатели развития речи у дошкольников с разным уровнем саморегуляции ; Lexical Indicators of Speech Development in Preschool Children with Different Levels of Self-Regulation
BASE
Show details
8
КОНТРОЛЬ УРОВНЯ ЯЗЫКОВОЙ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ИНОСТРАННЫХ СТУДЕНТОВ ПОДГОТОВИТЕЛЬНОГО ФАКУЛЬТЕТА
В.А. Гура. - : Zenodo, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
КОНТРОЛЬ УРОВНЯ ЯЗЫКОВОЙ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ ИНОСТРАННЫХ СТУДЕНТОВ ПОДГОТОВИТЕЛЬНОГО ФАКУЛЬТЕТА
В.А. Гура. - : Zenodo, 2018
BASE
Show details
10
Russian Event Noun Disambiguation Test Set (6X200)
BASE
Show details
11
Russian Event Noun Disambiguation Test Set (6X200)
BASE
Show details
12
Baselines and test data for cross-lingual inference
In: Agic , Z & Schluter , N 2018 , Baselines and test data for cross-lingual inference . in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) . European Language Resources Association , pp. 3890-3894 . (2018)
BASE
Show details
13
Development and Validation of Phonetically Balanced Speech Perception Test in Urdu Language
In: Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice (2018)
BASE
Show details
14
Standardization of Design Interfaces Applied to Language Test on-line through Ubiquitous Devices
In: International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM); Vol 12, No 4 (2018); pp. 21-31 ; 1865-7923 (2018)
BASE
Show details
15
The Relationship between English Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement for English Language Learners
In: Doctoral Dissertations and Projects (2018)
BASE
Show details
16
collogetr
BASE
Show details
17
First language test bias? : comparing French-speaking and Polish-speaking participants’ performance on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
BASE
Show details
18
INVESTIGATING ADVANCED LEARNERS’ USE OF AFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR DEALING WITH TEST ANXI-ETY
In: Neofilolog; Nr 46/1 (2016); 45-58 ; 1429-2173 (2018)
BASE
Show details
19
臺灣大學生閱讀與應試策略運用研究 ; A Study of Reading & Test-Taking Strategy Use Adopted by College Students in Taiwan
BASE
Show details
20
How valid are domain experts' judgements of workplace communication? Implications for setting standards on the Occupational English Test (OET) Writing sub-test
Abstract: © 2018 Dr. Simon Davidson ; As part of the prerequisite to obtain professional registration and practice in Australia, International Medical Graduates (IMGs) must satisfy requirements that include satisfactory clinical knowledge and competent English language proficiency. However, there has been some stated apprehension that the minimum standards on tests used to assess language competency (including the Occupational English Test (OET), a specific-purpose language (LSP) test for health professionals), might be inadequate for successful workplace readiness. To better understand the validity of these concerns, this study examined the minimum standards on the OET Writing sub-test via the process of ‘standard setting’ – a procedure for drawing insights from appropriate stakeholders (in this case doctors with experience of workplace communication demands) about levels of proficiency viewed as satisfactory for a particular purpose. The study sought to determine the minimum levels of competence deemed appropriate for effective performance in the workplace, and also to understand the basis for the decisions made and how closely these corresponded to the construct of communication that the OET is designed to measure. A previous study (Manias & McNamara, 2016; Pill & McNamara, 2016) explored these issues in relation to the OET Speaking sub-test, whereas the current study focuses on writing – a thus far neglected area. The writing task on the OET is a letter of referral, based on a set of provided case notes. 18 health professionals (all with experience of working as medical educators, GPs or specialists) were recruited to participate in standard-setting workshops designed to elicit decisions about what level of performance on this task was deserving of a passing grade and why. To gain further insight into the basis for the standards set, verbal reports in the form of a think-aloud protocol (TAP) were employed. The doctors’ comments from the workshops and verbal reports were thematically coded and intercoder reliability checks were conducted. Before new passing standards and ‘cut scores’ were calculated, a FACETS analysis (Linacre, 2017) was carried out to take into account any variation in domain experts’ ratings in terms of them being overly severe/lenient or inconsistent. The final quantitative analysis yielded a somewhat more stringent passing standard than the current one – mirroring the results of previous studies using the Analytic Judgement method (AJM) (e.g., Knoch et al., 2017 and Pill & McNamara, 2016). The new standards were compared with current OET cut scores and indicated a higher ‘fail’ rate with the current data set. The stricter passing standard established by domain experts in this study could be construed as backing indications and perceptions that the present benchmark is not set high enough and that some IMGs who are not yet communicatively competent are still joining Australian work environments with unsatisfactory communication skills. The qualitative analysis further investigated whether domain experts are competent to assess language proficiency separately from other professional skills (as stipulated by Australian federal government requirements). Some participants’ judgements (a minority overall) were influenced by views of candidates’ clinical competency, extending beyond the construct of communicative competence as defined by the OET. However, the qualitative findings, in the main, suggested that subject-matter experts were indeed attending to textual features related to what the OET is intended to measure. The central question of whether domain experts, without linguistic training, are well placed for setting the standards in a LSP test such as the OET was considered. Even though some participants’ judgements deviated somewhat from the current OET Writing sub-test criteria, validity evidence collected in this study verified, on the whole, that the subsequent new standards, derived from domain expert participation, were justified. The validity consequences of this study’s results for the OET Writing sub-test, and for LSP testing more generally, were reflected on using a unique argument-based validity framework posed by Knoch and Macqueen (in preparation). The practical and operational implications of the study’s findings for the OET were also considered. ; Open Access
Keyword: domain expert; health communication; language for specific purpose (LSP) test; standard setting; validity
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/213877
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...60

Catalogues
81
3
264
0
4
0
19
Bibliographies
550
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
2
0
0
0
Open access documents
595
2
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2021 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern