DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...49
Hits 1 – 20 of 966

1
Why Don’t Languages Grammaticalize [±poisonous]?
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020): Special Issue—Biolinguistic Research in the 21st Century; 51-58 ; 1450-3417 (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
BACK COVER
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020): Special Issue—Biolinguistic Research in the 21st Century ; 1450-3417 (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
FULL ISSUE
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 15 (2021) ; 1450-3417 (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
Notice
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 15 (2021); 34–35 ; 1450-3417 (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
FRONT COVER
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 15 (2021) ; 1450-3417 (2021)
BASE
Show details
6
BACK COVER
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 15 (2021) ; 1450-3417 (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
Minimax Feature Merge: The Featural Linguistic Turing Machine ...
Van Steene, Louis. - : Zenodo, 2021
BASE
Show details
8
Minimax Feature Merge: The Featural Linguistic Turing Machine ...
Van Steene, Louis. - : Zenodo, 2021
Abstract: In Minimalist syntax, linguistic expressions are typically modelled as being projected from a set of lexical items, themselves composed of three independent kinds of features (phonological, syntactic and semantic/pragmatic). The nature of syntactic features has perpetually been confused, and yet they remain the foundation of much of syntactic theory. I contest that an alternative architecture may be preferable in terms of explanatory power within the purview of mathematical biolinguistics, as described by Watumull (2012; 2013; 2015). Namely, I contest that, rather than being the driving force behind syntax, the lexicon is instead distributed amongst the interfaces in the form of non-generative lookup tables, taking Scheer’s (2020) view to the logical conclusion, in parallel to DM. Syntax combines syntactic primitives freely except as constrained by the interfaces; these features are atomic, arbitrary (substance-free) computational symbols comprising the set F with cardinality at least one. Following Watumull ...
Keyword: biolinguistics; features; group theory; interfaces; minimalism; syntax
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5796867
https://zenodo.org/record/5796867
BASE
Hide details
9
Biolingüística: teoría lingüística y ciencia cognitiva
In: Revista Española de Lingüística, ISSN 2254-8769, Año nº 51, Fasc. 2, 2021, pags. 93-110 (2021)
BASE
Show details
10
BACK COVER
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 15 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
11
FRONT COVER
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 15 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
12
BACK COVER
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 14, Iss SI (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
13
Notice
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 15 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
14
FULL ISSUE
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 15 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
15
Why Don’t Languages Grammaticalize [±poisonous]?
In: Biolinguistics, Vol 14, Iss SI (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
16
FULL ISSUE
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020) ; 1450-3417 (2020)
BASE
Show details
17
BACK COVER
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020) ; 1450-3417 (2020)
BASE
Show details
18
FULL ISSUE
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020): Special Issue—Biolinguistic Research in the 21st Century ; 1450-3417 (2020)
BASE
Show details
19
Children’s Learning of a Semantics-Free Artificial Grammar with Center Embedding
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020); 21-48 ; 1450-3417 (2020)
BASE
Show details
20
Notice
In: BIOLINGUISTICS; Vol. 14 (2020) ; 1450-3417 (2020)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...49

Catalogues
0
0
46
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
863
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
98
5
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern