| 1 |
Making use of transcription data from qualitative research within a corpus-linguistic paradigm:Issues, experiences, and recommendations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Supporting the corpus-based study of Shakespeare’s language:Enhancing a corpus of the First Folio
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Exploring and classifying the Arabic copula and auxiliary kāna via enhanced part-of-speech tagging
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
A survey of grammatical variability in Early Modern English drama
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum:(dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices
|
|
|
|
In: Cogn Neuropsychiatry (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Introduction: “Continuum” approaches to psychosis have generated reports of similarities and differences in voice-hearing in clinical and non-clinical populations at the cohort level, but not typically examined overlap or degrees of difference between groups. Methods: We used a computer-aided linguistic approach to explore reports of voice-hearing by a clinical group (Early Intervention in Psychosis service-users; N = 40) and a non-clinical group (spiritualists; N = 27). We identify semantic categories of terms statistically overused by one group compared with the other, and by each group compared to a control sample of non-voice-hearing interview data (log likelihood (LL) value 6.63+=p < .01; effect size measure: log ratio 1.0+). We consider whether individual values support a continuum model. Results: Notwithstanding significant cohort-level differences, there was considerable continuity in language use. Reports of negative affect were prominent in both groups (p < .01, log ratio: 1.12+). Challenges of cognitive control were also evident in both cohorts, with references to “disengagement” accentuated in service-users (p < .01, log ratio: 1.14+). Conclusion: A corpus linguistic approach to voice-hearing provides new evidence of differences between clinical and non-clinical groups. Variability at the individual level provides substantial evidence of continuity with implications for cognitive mechanisms underlying voice-hearing.
|
|
Keyword:
Articles
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713671/
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2020.1842727
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33158372
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 11 |
A linguistic approach to the psychosis continuum: (dis)similarities and (dis)continuities in how clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers talk about their voices
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
How do English translations differ from native English writings?:A multi-feature statistical model for linguistic variation analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Functional variation in the Spoken BNC2014 and the potential for register analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Approaching text typology through cluster analysis in Arabic
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
