| 41 |
INTERVENTION EFFECT, WH-MOVEMENT, AND FOCUS＊
|
|
|
|
In: http://ling.nthu.edu.tw/USTWPL/vol3/8_Intervention Effect, Wh-movement, and Focus_Yang, Barry C.-Y.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 42 |
The English and Foreign Languages University Hyderebad, India Two Types of Intervention Effects
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.nuu.edu.tw/~barryyang/document/Two Types of Intervention Effects (Glow handout).pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 43 |
INTERVENTION EFFECT, WH-MOVEMENT, AND FOCUS＊
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.nuu.edu.tw/~barryyang/document/Intervention Effect, Wh-movement, and Focus (pre-final version).pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 44 |
grateful for comments from the audiences on both occasions, and for further discussion and comment
|
|
|
|
In: http://philpapers.org/archive/SMISSA-3/
|
|
Abstract:
Philosophers often claim that it is through speech that we make knowledge of our minds available to one another, and that it is through the medium of a shared language that we achieve a genuine meeting of minds. When combined with a conception of linguistic understanding as the direct perception of meaning in people’s words, the view suggests that there is no barrier to knowing the minds of others. Certainly, when listening to a language we understand, we do not hear the acoustic speech signal as just a sequence of sounds: we hear what is being said. As a phenomenological observation, the claim is impeccable, but it is mistaken epistemologically to assume that when we hear words as meaningful it is because we hear meanings in the sounds, perceived as immediately present on the surface of speech. As I shall argue, talk of the surface of speech and the location of sounds is misplaced. What we directly perceive are the sources of sounds, and the source of speech sounds is the human voice. The experience of listening to speech gives us non-linguistic information about a voice as source, while the meanings we hear the voiced sounds to have are the meanings we as listeners have attached to those words: the meanings they have for us. Contrary to expectations, this inner model of linguistic understanding can still accommodate knowledge of what others are saying, and so presents no obstacle to our knowing what others have in mind.
|
|
URL: http://philpapers.org/archive/SMISSA-3/
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.593.1068
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 45 |
Why We Still Need Knowledge of Language1
|
|
|
|
In: http://philpapers.org/archive/SMIWWS/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
