| 1 |
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Communicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
Jaecks, P.; Galli, F.; Laska, A-C.; Wright, H. H.; Sebastián, E.; Kang, E. K.; Worrall, L.; Jakovac, T. P.; Ali, M.; Williams, L. J.; MacWhinney, B.; Breitenstein, C.; Pierce, J.; Bowen, A.; Fillingham, J.; Small, S.; Enderby, P.; Sandri, A. K.; Meinzer, M.; Abel, S.; Elders, A.; Gandolfi, M.; Brandenburg, C.; Mavis, I.; Mattioli, F.; Kambanaros, M.; Abo, M.; Togher, L.; Hinckley, J.; Snell, C.; Lorenz, A.; Kukkonen, T.; O’halloran, R.; Ribeiro, R.; Papathanasiou, I.; Ruiter, M. B.; Jesus, L.; Leemann, B.; Nilipour, R.; Stahl, B.; Rose, M. L.; Williams, L. R.; Kong, A. P.; Price, C.; Rubi-Fessen, I.; Palmer, R.; Khedr, E. M.; Rosso, C.; Godecke, E.; Marshall, R. S.; Szaflarski, J.; Laganaro, M.; Howard, D.; Visch-Brink, E.; Paik, N-J.; Hilari, K.; Godwin, J.; Brady, M. C.; Ralph, M. L.; Horton, S.; Glize, B.; Cranfill, T. B.; Jefferies, B.; Martins, I.; Copland, D.; di Pietro-Bachmann, M.; van der Meulen, I.; van de Sandt-Koenderman, M.; Becker, F.; Leff, A.; Patrício, B.; Thomas, S.; Rochon, E.; VandenBerg, K.. - 2018
|
|
Abstract:
Background: Speech and language therapy (SLT) interventions for people with aphasia are complex – for example, interventions vary by delivery model (face-to-face, tele-rehabilitation), dynamic (group, 1-to-1) and provider. Therapists tailor the functional relevance and intervention difficulty to the individual’s needs. Therapy regimes are planned at a specific intensity (hours per week), frequency (number of weekly sessions), duration (time from start to end of therapy intervention) and dose (total number of therapy hours). Detailed and transparent description of interventions for people with aphasia facilitates replication in clinic, between-study comparisons and data-syntheses. Incomplete intervention reporting and inconsisten-cies in the use of terminology have been observed (RELEASE: REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE Collaborators, 2015-2018; Brady, Kelly, Godwin, Enderby, & Campbell, 2016; Pierce, O’Halloran, Togher, & Rose, in press). Even when similar terms are used there may be little agreement on their use (Pierce et al., in press). Our RELEASE Collaboration includes 72 multidisciplinary, multilingual aphasia researchers from 28 countries. In preparation for planned meta-analyses (HS&DR 14/04/22) we sought to extract and synthesise information on SLT interventions for aphasia. Description of interventions in research reports have benefited from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR; (Hoffmann et al., 2014). The TIDieR checklist supports transparent reporting, data extraction and synthesis in aphasia research. It has facilitated an exploration of the contribution specific parameters (for example intensity) may make to the effectiveness of (or tolerance to) an intervention (Brady et al., 2016). However, while the variables described above are readily summarised, other aspects of therapeutic interventions such as the theoretical approach, the materials used and the procedures employed (the “Why” and “What” within TIDieR) are more challenging to summarise in manner supporting data synthesis and meta-analyses. The World Health Organisation’s (“International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI),”) also seeks a framework which supports the synthesis and statistical analysis of healthcare interventions based on (a) the treatment target, (b) the intended action to the target and (c) the processes and methods required to carry out the action (ICHI, 2018). However a framework which complements these initiatives and which supports greater consistency in the description of SLT interventions for aphasia is required. Aims: We sought to develop international consensus on a framework to support the description of SLT interventions for people with aphasia. Methods and procedures: Two researchers independently extracted information about the SLT interventions in our RELEASE database (Hoffmann et al., 2014). Information on therapy approaches, materials and procedures were extracted, where possible, as direct quotes from published reports. Using the narrative descriptions, similar approaches were grouped and assigned to one or more category labels by an experienced speech and language therapist. These preliminary groupings were shared with RELEASE Collaborators for review. Each reviewed interventions included within up to four category labels and responses via email were requested. There followed an opportunity for group discussion on the proposed categorisation via videoconference. Outcomes and results: Therapy interventions were categorised based on three per-spectives (a) the role of the intervention within the study design e.g., usual care as a comparison control (b) the intervention target e.g., rehabilitation of spoken language production and (c) the theoretical approach e.g., semantic therapy. We identified 15 SLT approaches. Categories were not mutually exclusive; rather they represented different ways of categorising a complex intervention. Inadequate reporting of therapy interven-tions, procedures and materials hampered some classifications. The Collaboration facilitated knowledge sharing relating to emerging treatment category definitions such as multimodal treatment (Pierce et al., in press) which reflected interventions aimed to utilise a range of learning mechanisms and neural networks to facilitate language recovery. Conclusions: Our collaboration agreed on a framework which supports transparent description, data synthesis and meta-analyses of SLT interventions for people with aphasia after stroke.
|
|
Keyword:
P Philology. Linguistics; RT Nursing
|
|
URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/25832/
https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1487021
https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/25832/3/Abstract%20IARC%20approaches%2024th%28submission%29.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Aboriginal mitogenomes reveal 50,000 years of regionalism in Australia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Creating an international, multidisciplinary, aphasia dataset of individual patient data (IPD) for the REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) project
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
A continuum of admixture in the Western Hemisphere revealed by the African Diaspora genome ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
A continuum of admixture in the Western Hemisphere revealed by the African Diaspora genome
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Contextual behavioural coaching: An evidence-based model for supporting behaviour change
|
|
|
|
In: 11 ; 2 ; 142 ; 154 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Studying the family diet: an investigation into association between diet, lifestyle and weight status in Malaysian families
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
A Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Specialty Clinic: A Model for Va Health Care
|
|
|
|
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia.
|
|
|
|
In: New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, no. 4, pp. 319-328 (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with dysglycemia.
|
|
|
|
In: New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, no. 4, pp. 309-318 (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Augmentation of bronchodilator responsiveness by leukotriene modifiers in Puerto Rican and Mexican children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
40th EASD Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes : Munich, Germany, 5-9 September 2004.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
