1 |
The conceptualisation of knowledge about aspect: From monolingual to multilingual representations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The conceptualisation of knowledge about aspect: From monolingual to multilingual representations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
(Non-)Prototypical combinations of grounding and lexical aspect. A pilot study on German learners of L3 Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Influence of L2 English on the acquisition of L3 Spanish pasttense morphology among L1 German speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Information structure and mood selection in Spanish complement clauses
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Vocabulary learning strategies among adult learners of Spanish as a foreign language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Using the Dictogloss in the high school foreign language classroom : noticing and learning new grammar
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology
|
|
|
|
MPI-SHH Linguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology : [Colloquium on "Description and Explanation in L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology ..." at the 21st annual meeting of AAAL (American Association for Applied Linguistics) held at Stamford, CT, in March 1999]
|
|
|
|
IDS Mannheim
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
What gets processed in Processing Instruction: A Commentary on Bill VanPatten's 'Processing Instruction: An Update'
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this article we respond to VanPatten's update of the findings for processing instruction. We begin by questioning the explanatory adequacy of the model of input processing that VanPatten has proposed and that underpins his pedagogic proposals. We question both the validity of the limited–capacity, single–resource model of attention he proposes for second language classroom learning, and also the details of the mechanisms he argues are implicated in second language processing. We then arguefor alternative explanations of the effects found for input processing instruction and against VanPatten's claim that the studies he reviews are true replications of earlier findings.Throughout we argue that further specification of cognitive resources, processing mechanisms,and conditions of learning operationalized in putative replications areessential if research into input processing instruction is to be explanatory, and cumulative, as VanPatten claims it is.
|
|
Keyword:
380302 Linguistic Processes (incl. Speech Production and Comprehension); 780107 Studies in human society; C1
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:145636
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|