1 |
The problem of Quechua -nka Distributivity vs. group forming
|
|
|
|
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzco Quechua
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The problem of Quechua -nka Distributivity vs. group forming
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Marie Curie Actions TAMEAL IRSES Deliverable D 2.2 - Second collection of TAMEAL papers
|
|
|
|
In: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01428693 ; 2017 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Reportativity, (Non-)at-issueness, and Assertion
|
|
|
|
In: Faller, Martina. (2014). Reportativity, (Non-)at-issueness, and Assertion. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 40(40), 62 - 84. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5f36r2m3 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Reportativity, (not-) at-issueness, and assertion
|
|
|
|
In: Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society; BLS 40: General and Special Sessions; 62-84 ; 2377-1666 ; 0363-2946 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
A possible worlds semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials
|
|
|
|
In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory; Proceedings of SALT 20; 660-683 ; 2163-5951 (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The Cusco Quechua reportative evidential and rhetorical relations
|
|
|
|
In: Endangered languages (Hamburg, 2007), p. 223-252
|
|
MPI für Psycholinguistik
|
|
15 |
The Ingredients of Reciprocity in Cuzco Quechua
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In Cuzco Quechua, reciprocity is marked by means of two verbal suffixes, one of which is a marker of reflexivity, the other of which is a marker of pluractionality. The paper develops an analysis that composes reciprocity from these more basic notions. Two further ingredients that are needed will be argued to derive from independent principles: universal quantification over parts of the reciprocal plural agent derives from plural predication, as has been argued by other researchers for English reciprocity, and distinctness of the participants in the reciprocal subevents derives from a semantic version of Condition B. This way of composing reciprocity is not universal, and other languages have dedicated reciprocal markers or make other reciprocal ingredients overt. The compositional derivation of reciprocity is therefore a clear candidate for cross-linguistic semantic variation.
|
|
Keyword:
Articles
|
|
URL: http://jos.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/3/255 https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm004
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|