1 |
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Dosage, intensity, and frequency of language therapy for aphasia: a systematic review–based, individual participant data network meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Protocol for the development of the international population registry for aphasia after stroke (I-PRAISE)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
An aphasia research agenda–a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
British muslims caught amidst fogs—a discourse analysis of religious advice and authority
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Nationwide survey on attitudes and perceived barriers toward provision of pharmaceutical care among final year undergraduate pharmacy students in the United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Communicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
RELEASE : a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
LHFPL5 mutation: A rare cause of non-syndromic autosomal recessive hearing loss
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The impact of the modernisation of Iran on Kurdish society : modernity, modernisation and social change (1920-1979)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
'Transediting’ Saudi Arabia by the BBC: a corpus-driven critical discourse analysis study of representations and power negotiation, 2013–2015
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Aphasiology, 2019 (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Background: Speech and language therapy (SLT) benefits people with aphasia following stroke. Group level summary statistics from randomised controlled trials hinder exploration of highly complex SLT interventions and a clinically relevant heterogeneous population. Creating a database of individual participant data (IPD) for people with aphasia aims to allow exploration of individual and therapy-related predictors of recovery and prognosis. Aim: To explore the contribution that individual participant characteristics (including stroke and aphasia profiles) and SLT intervention components make to language recovery following stroke. Methods and procedures: We will identify eligible IPD datasets (including randomised controlled trials, non-randomised comparison studies, observational studies and registries) and invite their contribution to the database. Where possible, we will use meta- and network meta-analysis to explore language performance after stroke and predictors of recovery as it relates to participants who had no SLT, historical SLT or SLT in the primary research study. We will also examine the components of effective SLT interventions. Outcomes and results: Outcomes include changes in measures of functional communication, overall severity of language impairment, auditory comprehension, spoken language (including naming), reading and writing from baseline. Data captured on assessment tools will be collated and transformed to a standardised measure for each of the outcome domains. Conclusion: Our planned systematic-review-based IPD meta- and network meta-analysis is a large scale, international, multidisciplinary and methodologically complex endeavour. It will enable hypotheses to be generated and tested to optimise and inform development of interventions for people with aphasia after stroke. Systematic review registration: The protocol has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42018110947).
|
|
URL: https://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=260135/243DCC36-C9A5-4974-A5E1-C14192CFA574.pdf&pub_id=260135
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|