1 |
Expressive and receptive use of speech and graphic symbols by typically developing children: What skills contribute to performance on structured sentence-level tasks? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Expressive and receptive use of speech and graphic symbols by typically developing children: What skills contribute to performance on structured sentence-level tasks? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Évaluer l'accès lexical : dénomination, narration ou évocation lexicale? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Expressive and receptive use of speech and graphic symbols by typically developing children: What skills contribute to performance on structured sentence-level tasks?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Le trouble développemental du langage (TDL) : mise à jour interdisciplinaire
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
A multi-site review of policies affecting opportunities for children with developmental disabilities to become bilingual
|
|
Pesco, Diane; MacLeod, Andrea A A N; Kay-Raining Bird, Elizabeth; Cleave, Patricia; Trudeau, Natacha; de Valenzuela, Julia Scherba; Cain, Kate; Marinova-Todd, Stefka H; Colozzo, Paola; Stahl, Hillary; Segers, Eliane; Verhoeven, Ludo. - 2016
|
|
Abstract:
This review of special education and language-in-education policies at six sites in four countries (Canada, United States, United Kingdom, and Netherlands) aimed to determine the opportunities for bilingualism provided at school for children with developmental disabilities (DD). While research has demonstrated that children with DD are capable of learning more than one language (see Kay Raining Bird, Genesee, & Verhoeven, this issue), it was not clear whether recent policies reflect these findings. The review, conducted using the same protocol across sites, showed that special education policies rarely addressed second language learning explicitly. However, at all sites, the policies favoured inclusion and educational planning based on individual needs, and thus implied that students with DD would have opportunities for second language learning. The language-in-education policies occasionally specified the support individuals with special needs would receive. At some sites, policies and educational options provided little support for minority languages, a factor that could contribute to subtractive bilingualism. At others, we found stronger support for minority languages and optional majority languages: conditions that could be more conducive to additive bilingualism.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82770/2/DD_Biling_Policy_Review.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.008 https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82770/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
7 |
Inferential comprehension of 3–6 year olds within the context of story grammar: a scoping review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Analyse de l'effet d'âge et du sexe sur l'utilisation des symboles graphiques
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Vers un outil d'évaluation du langage préscolaire et détecteur de préalables pour l'éducation de base au Cameroun en cas de retard de langage
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|