1 |
Innate immunity impacts social-cognitive functioning in people with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals: Implications for IL-1ra and urinary immune markers
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Behav Immun Health (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: exploring the first year
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury : exploring the first year
|
|
Elbourn, Elise; Kenny, Belinda J. (R19919); Power, Emma; Honan, Cynthia; McDonald, Skye; Tate, Robyn; Holland, Audrey; MacWhinney, Brian; Togher, Leanne. - : U.K., Taylor & Francis, 2019
|
|
Abstract:
Objectives: Although much is known about discourse impairment, little is known about discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). This paper explores discourse recovery across the critical first year, controlling for pre-injury, injury and post-injury variables. Design and methods: An inception cohort comprising 57 participants with severe TBI was examined at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury and compared to a cross-section of matched healthy control participants. A narrative discourse task was analyzed with main concept analysis (MCA). A mixed linear model approach was used to track recovery controlling for pre-injury, injury and post-injury variables. Results: An upward trajectory of recovery was observed, with peak periods of improvement between 3–6 and 9–12 months and all time points were significantly below controls. Years of education and PTA duration were significant covariates in the recovery model. Presence of aphasia also influenced the recovery model. Conclusions: Individuals with TBI typically improve over the first year, however many will continue to have discourse deficits at 12 months. Years of education, PTA duration and aphasia should be considered when planning services. The 3–6- and 9–12-month periods may offer optimal periods for discourse recovery and increased supports may be beneficial between 6-9 months.
|
|
Keyword:
brain damage; brain injury; communication; speech disorders; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:53242 https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1539246
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
4 |
Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Cognitive-communication and psychosocial functioning 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Conversational topics discussed by individuals with severe traumatic brain injury and their communication partners during sub-acute recovery
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Conversational topics discussed by individuals with severe traumatic brain injury and their communication partners during sub-acute recovery
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
The methodological quality of aphasia research: an investigation using the PsycBITE™ database
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|