DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
Case-based teaching & clinical reasoning: seeing how students think with PATSy
Cox, Richard; Lum, Carmel. - : Wiley, 2003
BASE
Show details
2
Scientific thinking in speech and language therapy
Lum, Carmel. - Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
3
Scientific Thinking in Speech and Language Therapy
Lum, Carmel. - Mahwah : Taylor & Francis Group, 2001
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
4
Investigating domain-knowledge and reasoning as predictors of diagnostic performance with PATSy.
Cox, Richard; Lum, Carmel; Kilgour, Jonathan. - : IOS Press Amsterdam, 2001
BASE
Show details
5
PATSy : a multimedia distributed webbase resource for aphasiologists in research and education
In: Aphasiology. - London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 13 (1999) 7, 573-579
BLLDB
Show details
6
Why Do Some Aphasics Show an Advantage on Some Tests of Non-propositional (Automatic) Speech?
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 70 (1999) 1, 95-118
OLC Linguistik
Show details
7
Why do some aphasics show an advantage on some tests of nonpropositional (automatic) speech?
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 70 (1999) 1, 95-118
BLLDB
Show details
8
Why do some aphasics show an advantage on some tests of nonpropositional (automatic) speech?
Lum, Carmel; Ellis, Andrew W.. - : New York, Academic Press, 1999
Abstract: Sixteen aphasic patients were given three pairs of tasks that compared the production of the same items in either propositional or nonpropositional contexts. A nonpropositional number production task involved counting from 1 to 10 while the propositional version of that task involved naming the Arabic numbers 1 to 10 in nonconsecutive order. A nonpropositional picture-naming task involved naming pictures with the aid of familiar phrase cues (e.g., Don't beat around the BUSH) while in the propositional version the cues were novel phrases (e.g., Don't dig behind the BUSH). Finally a nonpropositional phrase repetition task involved repeating well-known phrases while the propositional version involved repeating novel phrases. The group as a whole showed strong nonpropositional advantages for number production and picture naming with a somewhat weaker advantage for phrase repetition. Only 5 of the individual patients showed nonpropositional advantages on all three pairs of tasks: the remaining 11 patients showed a significant nonpropositional advantage on one or two of the pairs of tasks, but not on all three. All of the patients showed a nonpropositional advantage on at least one pair of tasks, and there were no examples of better performance on the propositional than on the nonpropositional version of any task. Contrasting patterns of performance seen in different patients was related to their performance on a battery of cognitive and linguistic tasks that was given to each patient. ; casl ; 70 ; pub ; 2518 ; pub ; 1
URL: https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/2518
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12289/2518
https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2147
BASE
Hide details
9
On the use of regression techniques for the analysis of single case aphasic data
In: Journal of neurolinguistics. - Orlando, Fla. : Elsevier 9 (1996) 3, 165-174
BLLDB
Show details
10
Is nonpropositional speech preserved in aphasia?
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 46 (1994) 3, 368-391
BLLDB
Show details
11
Is "Nonpropositional" Speech Preserved in Aphasia?
In: Brain & language. - Orlando, Fla. [u.a.] : Elsevier 46 (1994) 3, 368-391
OLC Linguistik
Show details

Catalogues
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
3
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern