1 |
A Novel Pupillometric Method (Chapman & Hallowell, 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
A Novel Pupillometric Method (Chapman & Hallowell, 2015) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Unfolding of cognitive effort in aphasia (Chapman & Hallowell, 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Unfolding of cognitive effort in aphasia (Chapman & Hallowell, 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Supplemental material, Chapman & Hallowell, "The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia," ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry
|
|
|
|
In: J Speech Lang Hear Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Expecting questions modulates effort: Pupillometry (Chapman & Hallowell, 2020) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
The role of sustained attention control in short-term memory recall in post-stroke aphasia ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Expecting questions modulates effort: Pupillometry (Chapman & Hallowell, 2020) ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: Pupillary responses captured via pupillometry (measurement of pupillary dilation and constriction during the performance of a cognitive task) are psychophysiological indicators of cognitive effort, attention, arousal, and resource engagement. Pupillometry may be a promising tool for enhancing our understanding of the relationship between cognition and language in people with and without aphasia. Interpretation of pupillary responses is complex. This study was designed as a stepping-stone for future pupillometric studies involving people with aphasia. Asking comprehension questions is common in language processing research involving people with and without aphasia. However, the influence of comprehension questions on pupillometric indices of task engagement (tonic responses) and cognitive effort (task-evoked responses of the pupil [TERPs]) is unknown. We tested whether asking comprehension questions influenced pupillometric results of adults without aphasia during a syntactic processing task. Method: ...
|
|
Keyword:
FOS Biological sciences; Language; Neuroscience; Physiology
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.23641/asha.13480368 https://asha.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Expecting_questions_modulates_effort_Pupillometry_Chapman_Hallowell_2020_/13480368
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Validity of an Eyetracking Method for Capturing Auditory-Visual Cross Format Semantic Priming
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Let’s call it “aphasia”: rationales for eliminating the term “dysphasia”
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
A Novel Eye-Tracking Method to Assess Attention Allocation in Individuals with and without Aphasia Using a Dual-Task Paradigm
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Exploring the Relationship between Attention Allocation and Working Memory Processes in Persons with and without Aphasia ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Exploring the Relationship between Attention Allocation and Working Memory Processes in Persons with and without Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
A tutorial on aphasia test development in any language: Key substantive and psychometric considerations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Concurrent validation of an eyetracking-based method for assessing attention allocation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|