| 1 |
Fostering Preservice and In-Service ELA Teachers’ Digital Practices for Addressing Climate Change
|
|
|
|
In: Teaching and Learning Faculty Publications (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
What Is English Education for? Rethinking Our Work through Climate Change and the Environment
|
|
|
|
In: Teaching and Learning Faculty Publications (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English (2010)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English (2007)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English (2008)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Review of Integrating Literature and Writing Instruction: First-Year English, Humanities Core Course, Seminars. Judith H. Anderson and Christine R. Farris, eds.
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Teaching Writing; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2008); 125-148 ; 2374-2852 ; 0735-1259 (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Fissures in standards formulation: The role of neoconservative and neoliberal discourses in justifying standards development in Wisconsin and Minnesota.
|
|
|
|
In: education policy analysis archives; Vol 15 (2007); 18 ; archivos analiticos de politicas educativas; Vol 15 (2007); 18 ; Arquivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas; Vol 15 (2007); 18 ; 1068-2341 (2007)
|
|
Abstract:
An analysis of English/language arts standards development in Wisconsin and Minnesota in the late 1990s and early 2000s shows a process of compromise between neoliberal and neoconservative factions involved in promoting and writing standards, with the voices of educators conspicuously absent. Interpretive and critical discourse analyses of versions of English/language arts standards at the high school level and of public documents related to standards promotion reveal initial conflicts between neoconservative and neoliberal discourses, which over time were integrated in final standards documents. The content standards finally released for use in guiding curriculum in each state were bland and incoherent documents that reflected neither a deep knowledge of the field nor an acknowledgement of what is likely to engage young learners. The study suggests the need for looking more critically at standards as political documents, and a greater consideration of educators' expertise in the process of their future development and revision.
|
|
Keyword:
discourse; neoconservative; neoliberal; language; policy development; standards
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v15n18.2007
https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/66
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Teaching Literature to Adolescents
|
|
|
|
In: Faculty & Staff Authored Books (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
