1 |
International Centre for Language and Communicative Development: Corpus and Experimental Study: Children's Acquisition of Wh-questions, 2019 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Multiword units lead to errors of commission in children's spontaneous production: “What corpus data can tell us?*”
|
|
|
|
In: Dev Sci (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Does Early Child Language Predict Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescence? An Investigation in Two Birth Cohorts Born 30 Years Apart
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The crosslinguistic acquisition of sentence structure: Computational modeling and grammaticality judgments from adult and child speakers of English, Japanese, Hindi, Hebrew and K'iche'()
|
|
|
|
In: Cognition (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The crosslinguistic acquisition of sentence structure: Computational modeling and grammaticality judgments from adult and child speakers of English, Japanese, Hindi, Hebrew and K'iche'
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Can Automated Gesture Recognition Support the Study of Child Language Development?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The crosslinguistic acquisition of sentence structure: Computational modeling and grammaticality judgments from adult and child speakers of English, Japanese, Hindi, Hebrew and K'iche'.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Identifying robust markers of Parkinson's disease in typing behaviour using a CNN-LSTM network.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Can Automated Gesture Recognition Support the Study of Child Language Development?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Disentangling the Different Factors that Contribute to the Production of 3rd Person Singular Errors in Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Analyzing group behavior from language use with natural language processing and experimental methods : three applications in political science and sociology
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Effects of Both Preemption and Entrenchment in the Retreat from Verb Overgeneralization Errors: Four Reanalyses, an Extended Replication, and a Meta-Analytic Synthesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Differences in the Association between Segment and Language: Early Bilinguals Pattern with Monolinguals and Are Less Accurate than Late Bilinguals
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Early bilinguals often show as much sensitivity to L2-specific contrasts as monolingual speakers of the L2, but most work on cross-language speech perception has focused on isolated segments, and typically only on neighboring vowels or stop contrasts. In tasks that include sounds in context, listeners’ success is more variable, so segment discrimination in isolation may not adequately represent the phonetic detail in stored representations. The current study explores the relationship between language experience and sensitivity to segmental cues in context by comparing the categorization patterns of monolingual English listeners and early and late Spanish–English bilinguals. Participants categorized nonce words containing different classes of English- and Spanish-specific sounds as being more English-like or more Spanish-like; target segments included phonemic cues, cues for which there is no analogous sound in the other language, or phonetic cues, cues for which English and Spanish share the category but for which each language varies in its phonetic implementation. Listeners’ language categorization accuracy and reaction times were analyzed. Our results reveal a largely uniform categorization pattern across listener groups: Spanish cues were categorized more accurately than English cues, and phonemic cues were easier for listeners to categorize than phonetic cues. There were no differences in the sensitivity of monolinguals and early bilinguals to language-specific cues, suggesting that the early bilinguals’ exposure to Spanish did not fundamentally change their representations of English phonology. However, neither did the early bilinguals show more sensitivity than the monolinguals to Spanish sounds. The late bilinguals however, were significantly more accurate than either of the other groups. These findings indicate that listeners with varying exposure to English and Spanish are able to use language-specific cues in a nonce-word language categorization task. Differences in how, and not only when, a language was acquired may influence listener sensitivity to more difficult cues, and the advantage for phonemic cues may reflect the greater salience of categories unique to each language. Implications for foreign-accent categorization and cross-language speech perception are discussed, and future directions are outlined to better understand how salience varies across language-specific phonemic and phonetic cues.
|
|
Keyword:
Psychology
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00993 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4926612/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Cross-language speech perception in context : advantages for recent language learners and variation across language-specific acoustic cues
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Differences in the Association between Segment and Language: Early Bilinguals Pattern with Monolinguals and Are Less Accurate than Late Bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Children’s willingness to accept labels in two languages: the role of exposure
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
The effects of payoffs and feedback on the disambiguation of relative clauses
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|