| 1 |
A three-stage model for implementing focused written corrective feedback
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
FACTORS INFLUENCING EFL STUDENTS’ UTILISATION OF TEACHER WRITTEN FEEDBACK
|
|
|
|
In: TEFLIN Journal, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 98-122 (2022) (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Written Corrective Feedback, Working Memory, and the Development of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of English Plurals ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
The Role of Individual Preferences in the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in an English for Academic Purposes Writing Course
|
|
|
|
In: Australian Journal of Teacher Education (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Assessing Writing in French-as-a-Foreign-Language: Teacher Practices and Learner Uptake
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 6; Issue 4; Pages: 210 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Student engagement with teacher written feedback on IELTS Writing Task 2 rehearsal essays
|
|
Pearson, WS. - : University of Exeter, 2021. : Graduate School of Education, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Can a ‘pedagogical’ spellchecker improve spelling accuracy in L2 Spanish?
|
|
Blazquez-Carretero, Miguel; Woore, Robert. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2021. : Center for Language & Technology, 2021. : (co-sponsored by Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, University of Texas at Austin), 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Focused direct corrective feedback: Effects on the elementary English learners’ written syntactic complexity
|
|
|
|
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 132-150 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Am I Promoting Feedback Cycle and Sociomaterial Learning?
|
|
|
|
In: Issues in Language Studies, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Written Comments on Undergraduate Theses Written in Spanish as a First Language and English as a Foreign Language
|
|
|
|
In: Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 52-68 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Omani EFL writing instructors’ attitudes and reported and actual practices towards written corrective feedback in first year foundation programmes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
An Inquiry into Effective Written Feedback from EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives at a Saudi University
|
|
Albogami, M. - : University of Exeter, 2020. : School of Education, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Validating written feedback in clinical formative assessment
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Less is more? The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
THE TEACHERS’ BELIEFS IN TEACHER WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE STUDENTS' WRITING
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, Vol 5, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
The Effects of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedbacks on the Business Communication Texts of Technical University Students in Ghana
|
|
|
|
In: Applied Linguistics Research Journal, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 25-39 (2020) (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Grading of texts is a major issue in the field of teaching and learning of Business Communication. One emerging technique used in grading students' texts is corrective feedback. This research was an effort to investigate the effects that direct and indirect written corrective feedbacks had on the business letters of students of Ho Technical University, Ghana. Forty HND 1 (first year) students in the Department of Marketing from the 2016/2017 Academic Year batch of Ho Technical University were the selected participants for this qualitative study. A total of 80 raw data were solicited from the participants. These comprise 40 pre-test and 40 post-test materials (80 texts). Each participant composed two letters – one at the pre-test level and the other at the post-test level. After the pre-test, the texts of the students were divided into two groups. The texts of the first group (DF) were graded using direct feedback method and those of the other group (IF) were graded using indirect feedback method. After the pre-test, the participants were asked to rewrite the business letter. The results from the post-test showed that students performed better at the post-test level when direct feedback technique was applied on their pre-test texts.
|
|
Keyword:
business communication; direct feedback; indirect feedback; Language and Literature; P; P1-1091; Philology. Linguistics; written corrective feedback
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2020.46320
https://doaj.org/article/cfe9135df61043f09b85a15cff8b5185
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers’ practices and students’ expectations
|
|
|
|
In: English Language Teaching Educational Journal, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 95-107 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The effects of different types of written corrective feedback on students’ texting mistakes
|
|
|
|
In: English Language Teaching Educational Journal, Vol 3, Iss 3, Pp 174-187 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Students’ preferences and teachers’ beliefs towards written corrective feedback
|
|
|
|
In: ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 85-95 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
