| 3 |
Language Development in the Second Year of Life: The Case of Children with Sex Chromosome Trisomies Diagnosed before Birth
|
|
|
|
In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; Volume 19; Issue 3; Pages: 1831 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Stigma and Sentiment: The Perception of Terms Related to Sex Industry Participants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
К ПРОБЛЕМЕ НОМИНАТИВНОСТИ КАТЕГОРИИ РОДА ОДУШЕВЛЕННЫХ СУЩЕСТВИТЕЛЬНЫХ ... : ON THE PROBLEM OF NOMINATIVENESS OF THE GENUS CATEGORY OF ANIMATE NOUNS ...
|
|
Ян Нань. - : Мир науки, культуры, образования, 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Influencia del sexo y la lengua materna en el rendimiento académico
|
|
|
|
In: Propósitos y Representaciones: Revista de Psichología Educativa ; 8 ; 1 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Performance as Translation in the Americas: Ana Mendieta's Feminist Ethnographies, 1973-81
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
El discurso fundamentalista religioso cubano sobre el matrimonio igualitario y la educación sexual integral
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03318624 ; 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The body and its figuration in Sony Labou and Sami Tchak ; Enjeux et figurations du Corps chez Sony Labou Tansi et Sami Tchak
|
|
|
|
In: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03537246 ; Linguistique. Université de Limoges, 2021. Français. ⟨NNT : 2021LIMO0041⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
“Perlustration” sequences in prenatal ultrasound scans: Seeing and speaking about sex ; Séquences de « perlustration » dans les échographies prénatales : dire et voir le sexe
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0181-4095 ; EISSN: 2101-0382 ; Langage et Société ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03266449 ; Langage et Société, Maison des Sciences de L'homme Paris, 2021, Charles Goodwin : l’interaction au carrefour du langage, du corps et de la société, 173, pp.57-82. ⟨10.3917/ls.173.0059⟩ ; https://www.cairn.info/revue-langage-et-societe-2021-2-page-57.htm (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Hand Preference in Adults’ Referential Gestures during Storytelling: Testing for Effects of Bilingualism, Language Ability, Sex and Age
|
|
|
|
In: Symmetry ; Volume 13 ; Issue 10 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
UNA HISTORIA PANORÁMICA DEL «GÉNERO GRAMATICAL» EN LA LENGUA ESPAÑOLA: ¿ES EL GÉNERO UNA «CLASE SEXUAL»?
|
|
|
|
In: Tonos Digital; NÚMERO 40- ENERO 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Sex work and speech: the public perception of terms describing sex industry participants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Contrastive intonation effects on word recall for information-structural alternatives across the sexes
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Focus highlights the fact that contextual alternatives are relevant for the interpretation of an utterance. For example, if someonesays:“The meeting is on TUESDAY,”with focus marked by a pitch accent on“Tuesday,”the speaker might want to correct theassumption that the meeting is on Monday (an alternative date). Intonation as one way to signal focus was manipulated in adelayed-recall paradigm. Recall of contextual alternatives was tested in a condition where a set of alternatives was evoked bycontrastive intonation. A control condition used intonation contours reported for broad focus in German. It was hypothesized thatcontrastive intonation improves recall, just as focus-sensitive particles (e.g.,‘only’) do, compared to sentences without suchparticles. Participants listened to short texts introducing a list of three elements from taxonomic categories. One of the threeelements was re-mentioned in a subsequent critical sentence, realized with either a broad (H+!H*) or with a contrastive intonationcontour (L+H*). Cued recall of the list elements was tested block-wise. Results show that contrastive intonation enhances recallfor focus alternatives. In addition, it was found that the observed recall benefit is predominantly driven by females. The resultssupport the assumption that contextual alternatives are better encoded in memory irrespective of whether focus is expressedprosodically or by a focus-sensitive particle. The results further show that females are more sensitive to pragmatic informationconveyed through prosody than males. ; Peer Reviewed
|
|
Keyword:
410 Linguistik; Alternatives; ddc:410; Delayed recall; Focus; Memory; Sex differences
|
|
URN:
urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/23626-7
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01174-1
http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/18452/23626
https://doi.org/10.18452/22948
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Menstruation Discrimination and the Problem of Shadow Precedents
|
|
|
|
In: Articles by Maurer Faculty (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Do women and men use language differently in spoken face-to-face interaction? A scoping review
|
|
|
|
In: Review of Communication Research ; 9 ; 43-79 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
