| 2 |
Диахронический анализ настоящего и будущего времен в алтайских языках ... : Diachronic analysis of present and future tenses in Altaic languages ...
|
|
Гусейнова, Р.Г.. - : ООО "Институт развития образования и консалтинга", 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Топонимическая система как ресурс изучения древней истории региона (на примере Хакасии) ; Toponymic System as a Resource to Explore the Ancient History of a Region: the Case of K hakassia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
"Agglutinating" a Family: Friedrich Max Müller and the Development of the Turanian Language Family Theory in Nineteenth-Century European Linguistics and Other Human Sciences
|
|
|
|
In: Dissertations and Theses (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Partitivity and case marking in Turkish and related languages
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 2, No 1 (2017); 20 ; 2397-1835 (2017)
|
|
Abstract:
The paper discusses the conditions for case marking on partitive constructions in direct object position in Turkish and some related languages. We focus on Turkish and then turn to some details of corresponding constructions in some other Turkic languages and in Standard Mongolian. Turkish exhibits Differential Object Marking, which primarily depends on the semantic-pragmatic factor of specificity. Partitive constructions with the ablative for the superset in Turkish come in different forms, depending on how the subset expression is realized: (a) by a lexical noun as head, (b) by the classifier tane ‘item’, functioning as a “dummy noun”, and (c) by a numeral, quantifier or adjective. Case marking of the direct object is optional for (a), and obligatory for (most instances of) (c). This type of obligatory case marking is dependent on the obligatory marking of the adjective, quantifier or numeral with a default 3rd person singular agreement suffix, which then requires case marking. Construction (b) does not allow for case marking, when the classifier is bare; when the classifier is followed by the default 3rd person singular agreement marking, that marking requires obligatory case morphology, just like in construction (c). We hypothesize that structural case marking can either express the semantic-pragmatic condition of specificity in terms of referential anchoring or it must obey a formal condition, namely the requirement of the agreement suffix to be followed by overt case. The languages we have studied show an interesting micro-variation. They differ (among other properties) with respect to classifiers – in particular, with respect to whether they have [+human] classifiers or not. In addition, one language among the languages under investigation, namely Kirghiz, substitutes the agreement marker in its function as a filler of the partitive’s nominal head by a different marker: a morpheme expressing a set. Here, the agreement marker is used to express specificity, given that its presence is not required for formal reasons. In direct object partitive constructions with subset expressions that are expressed as full noun phrase/lexical noun heads (option (a) above), overt accusative case indicates specificity in most of the investigated languages. In options (b) and (c), the investigated languages provide different patterns when marking the referential status of the partitive heads, thus indicating the variation among these languages with respect to the nominal category feature of the partitive heads involved.This article is part of the Special Collection: Partitives
|
|
Keyword:
Altaic languages; Differential Object Marking; partitivity; Turkic languages; Turkish
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.112
https://www.glossa-journal.org/jms/article/view/gjgl.112
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 11 |
DECLENSION SYSTEM OF THE TURKIC LANGUAGES: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF CASE ENDINGS
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
СРАВНИТЕЛЬНО-ИСТОРИЧЕСКАЯ ФОНОЛОГИЯ В ЕВРОПЕЙСКОМ ТЮРКСКОМ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИИ
|
|
АВРУТИНА АПОЛЛИНАРИЯ СЕРГЕЕВНА. - : Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Череповецкий государственный университет», 2016
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
The Sakha and the Evenk: Fundamentals of Common Conceptual Space ; Саха и эвенки: основы единого концептуального пространства
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Telling general linguists about Altaic
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Linguistics (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Telling general linguists about Altaic
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Linguistics (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Paradigm change : in the Transeurasian languages and beyond
|
|
|
|
MPI-SHH Linguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
