2 |
Диахронический анализ настоящего и будущего времен в алтайских языках ... : Diachronic analysis of present and future tenses in Altaic languages ...
|
|
Гусейнова, Р.Г.. - : ООО "Институт развития образования и консалтинга", 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Топонимическая система как ресурс изучения древней истории региона (на примере Хакасии) ; Toponymic System as a Resource to Explore the Ancient History of a Region: the Case of K hakassia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
"Agglutinating" a Family: Friedrich Max Müller and the Development of the Turanian Language Family Theory in Nineteenth-Century European Linguistics and Other Human Sciences
|
|
|
|
In: Dissertations and Theses (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Partitivity and case marking in Turkish and related languages
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 2, No 1 (2017); 20 ; 2397-1835 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
DECLENSION SYSTEM OF THE TURKIC LANGUAGES: HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF CASE ENDINGS
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
СРАВНИТЕЛЬНО-ИСТОРИЧЕСКАЯ ФОНОЛОГИЯ В ЕВРОПЕЙСКОМ ТЮРКСКОМ ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИИ
|
|
АВРУТИНА АПОЛЛИНАРИЯ СЕРГЕЕВНА. - : Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Череповецкий государственный университет», 2016
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
The Sakha and the Evenk: Fundamentals of Common Conceptual Space ; Саха и эвенки: основы единого концептуального пространства
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Telling general linguists about Altaic
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Linguistics (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Telling general linguists about Altaic
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Linguistics (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
The hypothesis of an Altaic language family, comprising the Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Korean and, in most recent versions, Japanese languages continues to be a viable linguistic proposal, despite various published claims that it is no longer accepted. A strong body of research continues to appear, developing and refining the hypothesis, along with publications that argue against a demonstrated relationship among these languages. This paper shows that many of the arguments against a genetic relationship fail to address the criteria demanded in modern historical linguistics, while many of the responses from proponents of the Altaic theory have failed to address the criticisms raised. We hope that arguments focusing on the real issues of phonological correspondences and morphological systems will shed greater light on the relationship among these languages.
|
|
Keyword:
Diachronic Linguistics (18500); Keywords: Altaic Languages (01850); Language Classification (41900)
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/90673
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Paradigm change : in the Transeurasian languages and beyond
|
|
|
|
MPI-SHH Linguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|