1 |
Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?:A transitivity analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)? A transivity analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
How certain is ‘certain’?:Exploring how the English-language media reported the use of calibrated language in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Uncertainty discourses in the context of climate change:A corpus-assisted analysis of UK national newspaper articles
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Uncertainty discourses in the context of climate change: a corpus-assisted analysis of UK national newspaper articles
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
How certain is ‘certain’?: exploring how the English-language media reported the use of calibrated language in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Climate change and ‘climategate’ in online reader comments: a mixed methods study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors and the argument from catastrophe
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Geoengineering the climate by reflecting sunlight or extracting carbon dioxide from the atmo- sphere has attracted increasing attention from natural scientists, social scientists, policy makers and the media. This article examines promotional discourse related to geoengineering from the 1980s to 2010. It asks in particular how this option for dealing with the problems posed by cli- mate change were framed through the use of conceptual and discourse metaphors and whether one can argue that these are metaphors we “live by” or metaphors we might “die by.” Findings show that an overarching argument from catastrophe was bolstered by three conceptual master-metaphors, namely “THE PLANET IS A BODY,” “THE PLANET IS A MACHINE,” and “THE PLANET IS A PATIENT/ADDICT,” linked to a variety of discourse metaphors, older conceptual metaphors, and clichés. This metaphorical landscape began to shift while the article was being written and will have to be closely monitored in the future. ; ESRC RES-360-25-0068.
|
|
Keyword:
cognitive linguistics; discourse analysis; geoengineering; metaphor; public understanding; qualitative research; science communication
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2086/8020 https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.665795
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
14 |
Climate change and 'climategate' in online reader comments: a mixed methods study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
From carbon markets to carbon morality: creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|