DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3
Hits 1 – 20 of 42

1
Verbal content : discussion
In: The languages of the brain. - Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard Univ. Press (2002), 143-146
BLLDB
Show details
2
Discourse structure, intentions, and intonation
In: The languages of the brain. - Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard Univ. Press (2002), 127-142
BLLDB
Show details
3
Discourse structure and intention recognition
In: Handbook of natural language processing. - New York [u.a.] : Dekker (2000), 123- 146
BLLDB
Show details
4
Squibs and Discussions - Conceptions of Limited Attention and Discourse Focus
In: Computational linguistics. - Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press 25 (1999) 4, 617-624
OLC Linguistik
Show details
5
Conceptions of limited attention and discourse focus
In: Computational linguistics. - Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press 25 (1999) 4, 617-624
BLLDB
Show details
6
Centering theory discourse
Cote, Sharon (Mitarb.); Grosz, Barbara J. (Mitarb.); Hoffman, Beryl (Mitarb.). - Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1998
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
7
Centering, global focus and right-dislocation
In: Centering theory in discourse (Oxford, 1998), p. 293-308
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
8
Lost intuitions and forgotten intentions
In: Centering theory in discourse (Oxford, 1998), p. 39-54
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
9
Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse
In: Computational linguistics. - Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press 21 (1995) 2, 203-226
OLC Linguistik
Show details
10
Centering : a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse
In: Computational linguistics. - Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press 21 (1995) 2, 203-225
BLLDB
Show details
11
Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse
In: Cognitive science ; 3. - Aldershot : Elgar (1995), 450-479
BLLDB
Show details
12
Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Local Coherence of Discourse
In: DTIC AND NTIS (1995)
BASE
Show details
13
Instructions for Annotating Discourse
Abstract: This guide contains instructions for segmenting discourse that are meant to be self-contained. Although based on a particular theory of discourse structure, they do not make reference in any way to that theory. As a result, they can be used by "naive" subjects, i.e., segmenters who have not studied discourse theory or discourse processing methods. Indeed, they were designed explicitly for use by such subjects. An earlier version of the instructions was used by students in a discourse class before exposure to the theory on which the instructions are based. We augmented and modified the instructions based on this experience and are currently using them with naive subjects. We are disseminating the instructions so that others may use and experiment with them. We made two assumptions about the annotation environment in constructing this guide. First, we presume that segmenters will use an on-line marking tool to do their segmentation; we use Flammia's N. b. (Nota Bene) (Flammia and Zue, 1995). Second, we assume that the input text they are given to segment will be divided in advance by the experimenters into phrases; we use the intermediate phrase (Pierrehumbert, 1980; Beckman and Pierrehumbert, 1986) to determine these phrases in our studies (Hirschberg and Grosz, 1992; Grosz and Hirschberg, 1992, inter-alia). In addition, it is important to be aware of two places in which the guide makes reference to experimental options. First, the introduction to Section 2 allows for questioning the experimenter about the examples in the guide. Second, Section 4 introduces a number of special relationships between segments, not all of which may be relevant to the discourses or segmentation needs of other experiments. Thus, before employing this guide, experimenters should choose a marking tool, determine minimal units for annotation and divide up the discourses to be annotated accordingly, decide the extent to which they will allow questioning, and identify those sections of the guide that are relevant. We also recommend that segmenters be given adequate practice on training examples before they are asked to analyze discourses for your studies. The cooking instructions that are used for most of the examples in this guide have been adapted from a dialogue recorded at AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey, on 4 February 1987. We would like to acknowledge the researchers involved in making the original recording: Joan Bachenko, Bruce Ballard, Ron Brachman, Eileen Fitzpatrick, Mark Jones, Diane Litman, and Guy Story; special thanks to Eileen Fitzpatrick for making the transcripts available to us. The remaining examples, as well as the cooking instruction adaptations, were constructed by the authors. ; Engineering and Applied Sciences ; Version of Record
URL: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26506433
BASE
Hide details
14
Natural language processing
Pereira, Fernando C.N.; Grosz, Barbara J.. - Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press, 1994
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
15
Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse
In: Cognitive science. - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Blackwell 17 (1993) 3, 311-348
OLC Linguistik
Show details
16
Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse
In: Cognitive science. - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Blackwell 17 (1993) 3, 311-347
BLLDB
Show details
17
A reply to Hobbs
In: Intentions in communication (Cambridge, Mass., 1990), P. 461-462
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
18
Plans for discourse
In: Intentions in communication (Cambridge, Mass., 1990), P. 417-444
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
19
Natural-language interfaces
In: Exploring artificial intelligence. - San Mateo, Calif. : Kaufmann (1988), 133-172
BLLDB
Show details
20
Plans for Discourse
In: DTIC AND NTIS (1988)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3

Catalogues
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
19
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
5
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
11
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern