1 |
Online representations of non-canonical sentences are more than good-enough ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Online representations of non-canonical sentences are more than good-enough ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Irony as a Test of the Presupposition-Denial Account: An ERP Study
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Investigating effects of emoji on neutral narrative text: evidence from eye movements and perceived emotional valence
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Investigating effects of emoji on neutral narrative text: evidence from eye movements and perceived emotional valence
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Digital images of faces such as emoji in virtual communication have become increasingly popular, but current research findings are inconsistent regarding their emotional effects on perceptions of text. Similarly, emoji effects on reading behaviours are largely unknown and require further examination. The present study (N = 41) investigated how the position and emotional valence of emoji in neutral narrative sentences influenced eye movements during reading and perceptions of sentence valence. Participants read neutral narrative sentences containing smiling or frowning emoji in sentence-initial or sentence-final positions and rated the perceived emotional valence of the sentence. Results from linear mixed-effects models demonstrated significantly longer fixations on sentence-final emoji and longer sentence reading times when emoji were in sentence-final positions. These findings are comparable to sentence ‘wrap-up’ effects witnessed in the processing of lexical units during sentence reading, providing new evidence towards the way readers integrate emoji into contextual processing. However, no impact of emoji valence or position on first-pass target word processing or sentence-valence ratings were found. This would refute previous suggestions that digital faces influence text valence, raising questions about reader preference for emoji or sentence sentiment, the influence of sentence formatting, and delivery/display mechanism on these effects. ; past 3 months from publication so not chasing full text
|
|
Keyword:
emoji; eye movement; Subject Categories::G440 Human-computer Interaction
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10547/624049 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106361
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
7 |
Electrophysiological dynamics of Chinese phonology during visual word recognition in Chinese-English bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Task-dependent evaluative processing of moral and emotional content during comprehension: an ERP study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Electrophysiological dynamics of Chinese phonology during visual word recognition in Chinese-English bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Examining the emotional impact of sarcasm using a virtual environment
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Local text cohesion, reading ability and individual science aspirations: Key factors influencing comprehension in science classes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Individual differences in the effectiveness of text cohesion for science text comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and reading ability
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and reading ability
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: the roles of familiarity and context
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Local text cohesion, reading ability and individual science aspirations: key factors influencing comprehension in science classes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
When language gets emotional: irony and the embodiment of affect in discourse
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Local text cohesion, reading ability and individual science aspirations : Key factors influencing comprehension in science classes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Individual differences in the effectiveness of text cohesion for science text comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|