• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Heffner, Christopher Cullen (2)
    • Quesada Real, Francisco José (2)
    • The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives (2)
    • Adger, D (1)
    • Atran, Scott (1)
    • Barcelo Aspeitia, Axel (1)
    • Bundy, Alan (1)
    • Cosmides, Leda (1)
    • Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology, and Foundations (LEPF) (1)
    • Department of Psychology (1)
    •   more
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 20 of 20 1 Domain-aware ontology matching ... Quesada Real, Francisco José. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2021 BASE Show details 2 Domain-aware ontology matching Quesada Real, Francisco José. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2021 BASE Show details 3 A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks. Hsu, Nina S; Jaeggi, Susanne M; Novick, Jared M. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2017 BASE Show details 4 Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation ... Heffner, Christopher Cullen. - : Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2017 BASE Show details 5 Nonmusical Correlates of Musical Ability Swaminathan, Swathi. - 2017 BASE Show details 6 Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation Heffner, Christopher Cullen. - 2017 BASE Show details 7 Language modularity Harris, Lindsay N., 1979--; Lech, Iwona B.. - 2016 BASE Show details 8 Further Exploring Processing Differences Between Geometric Shapes and Shape Words Scordas, Chelsea V. In: Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2016) BASE Show details 9 Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora Adger, D; Svenonius, P. - 2016 BASE Show details 10 Attention and executive control during lexical processing in aphasia Evans, William Streicher. - 2015 BASE Show details 11 Using a Delayed Match-to-Samples Task to Investigate the Isolated Processing of Geometric Shapes and Their Corresponding Shape Words Edwards, Joshua E In: Georgia Southern University Research Symposium (2015) Abstract: Evidence suggests an isolated system dedicated to processing geometric information (Spelke, Lee, & Izard, 2010). Isolating geometric processing from linguistic and semantic processing has remained difficult. Recently, Sturz, Edwards, and Boyer (2014) utilized a delayed match-to-sample (DMTS) task to present participants with a sample composed of either a shape, a shape word, or a bi-dimensional stimulus composed of a shape and a shape word. After a delay, participants were required to identify the sample shape or the sample word by selecting between two shapes or two shape words. Results suggested that sample shapes did not interfere with selecting a correct match in the presence of two shape words, but a sample shape word result in interference in selecting between two shapes. Interference took the form of increased reaction times and increased errors in the presence of selecting between two shapes but not two words. Results were interpreted as suggesting that shapes do not activate a semantic representation of shape words but shape words activate a spatial representation of shapes. The present experiments attempted to replicate and extend these results. Experiment 1 included a condition that was identical to the original condition (Unfilled) and one condition in which the shapes were filled (Filled) to address a potential explanation based upon sample shape saliency. Experiment 2 tested the assumption that shapes do not activate a semantic representation by reversing the matching requirement such that a sample shape word needed to be matched to its corresponding shape whereas a sample shape needed to be matched to its corresponding shape word. Such a reversal should require the semantic processing of shapes and result in increased reaction time and decreased accuracy. Experiment 1 replicated the asymmetrical results for both Filled and Unfilled conditions and provides evidence against an explanation based upon saliency. As predicted Experiment 2 produced a symmetrical pattern of results and indicated that word targets took a significantly longer time to match compared to shape targets. Collectively, results support an isolated system dedicated to processing geometric information by suggesting that both shapes and shape-words are automatically processed by two different psychological mechanisms. Keyword: Cognition and Perception; Cognitive Psychology; Delayed match-to-sample task; Domain specificity; Geometry; Modularity; Semantics; Suppression URL: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/research_symposium/2015/2015/166 BASE Hide details 12 Resisting Everything Except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain-Specific Impulsivity Tsukayama, Eli In: Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations (2012) BASE Show details 13 Comparison of Instrumentalists and Vocalists on a Lexical Tone Perception Task Kirkham, Joseph. - 2011 BASE Show details 14 The Contribution of Domain Specificity in the Highly Modular Mind Barcelo Aspeitia, Axel; Erana, Angeles; Stainton, Robert J. In: Robert J. Stainton (2010) BASE Show details 15 How Does the Mind Do Literary Work? S. Versace; G. Thoms. - 2009 BASE Show details 16 Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not Ermer, Elsa; Guerin, Scoft A.; Cosmides, Leda... In: Ermer, Elsa; Guerin, Scoft A.; Cosmides, Leda; Tooby, John; & Miller, Michael B.(2006). Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1, 196 - 219. UC Santa Barbara: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6c53x1nx (2006) BASE Show details 17 Sex differences in lexical size across semantic categories Laws, K.R.. - 2004 BASE Show details 18 The Case for Modularity: Sin or Salvation? Atran, Scott In: Evolution and Cognition ; https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000135 ; Evolution and Cognition, 2001, 7 (1), pp.46-55 (2001) BASE Show details 19 Grammatical knowledge vs. syntactic processing in the human brain Evelina Fedorenko Nancy Kanwisher In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_98.pdf BASE Show details 20 How Does the Mind Work? Insights from Biology Gary Marcus In: http://www.psych.nyu.edu/gary/marcusArticles/Marcus 2009 topics.pdf BASE Show details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 20 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0