DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 20 of 20

1
Domain-aware ontology matching ...
Quesada Real, Francisco José. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2021
BASE
Show details
2
Domain-aware ontology matching
Quesada Real, Francisco José. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks.
Hsu, Nina S; Jaeggi, Susanne M; Novick, Jared M. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2017
BASE
Show details
4
Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation ...
Heffner, Christopher Cullen. - : Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2017
BASE
Show details
5
Nonmusical Correlates of Musical Ability
BASE
Show details
6
Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation
BASE
Show details
7
Language modularity
BASE
Show details
8
Further Exploring Processing Differences Between Geometric Shapes and Shape Words
In: Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2016)
BASE
Show details
9
Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora
BASE
Show details
10
Attention and executive control during lexical processing in aphasia
BASE
Show details
11
Using a Delayed Match-to-Samples Task to Investigate the Isolated Processing of Geometric Shapes and Their Corresponding Shape Words
In: Georgia Southern University Research Symposium (2015)
BASE
Show details
12
Resisting Everything Except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain-Specific Impulsivity
In: Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations (2012)
BASE
Show details
13
Comparison of Instrumentalists and Vocalists on a Lexical Tone Perception Task
Kirkham, Joseph. - 2011
BASE
Show details
14
The Contribution of Domain Specificity in the Highly Modular Mind
In: Robert J. Stainton (2010)
BASE
Show details
15
How Does the Mind Do Literary Work?
S. Versace; G. Thoms. - 2009
BASE
Show details
16
Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not
In: Ermer, Elsa; Guerin, Scoft A.; Cosmides, Leda; Tooby, John; & Miller, Michael B.(2006). Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1, 196 - 219. UC Santa Barbara: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6c53x1nx (2006)
BASE
Show details
17
Sex differences in lexical size across semantic categories
Laws, K.R.. - 2004
BASE
Show details
18
The Case for Modularity: Sin or Salvation?
In: Evolution and Cognition ; https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000135 ; Evolution and Cognition, 2001, 7 (1), pp.46-55 (2001)
BASE
Show details
19
Grammatical knowledge vs. syntactic processing in the human brain
In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_98.pdf
Abstract: Caramazza & Zurif (1976) demonstrated that Broca’s aphasics have difficulty understanding semantically reversible constructions where word order is the primary cue to meaning. Subsequent neuroimaging investigations have reported activations in the posterior parts of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and anterior insula/frontal operculum for syntactic complexity contrasts (e.g., Stromswold et al., 1996; Ben-Shachar et al., 2003). However, three sets of findings are problematic for the notion that Broca’s area is the “seat of syntax”. First, using a grammaticality judgment task Linebarger et al. (1983) demonstrated that syntactic knowledge is largely preserved in Broca’s aphasics. Second, the ability to process syntactically complex structures has been linked to non-linguistic abilities, like general working memory (e.g., King & Just, 1991; Gordon et al., 2002; Fedorenko et al., 2006). And third, contrasts between structured (e.g., sentences) vs. unstructured (e.g., lists of words) stimuli activate brain regions that appear to be non-overlapping with the brain regions where syntactic complexity effects typically arise (e.g., Fedorenko et al., 2010).In fact, regions sensitive to syntactic complexity respond more strongly during the processing of word lists than sentences (Fedorenko et al., in prep.). We argue that linguistic processing is accomplished by the joint engagement of two functionally and computationally distinct brain systems: i) “language regions ” on the lateral surfaces of left frontal and temporal lobes that appear to be functionally specialized for linguistic processing, showing no response to working memory
Keyword: Domain generality; Domain specificity; fMRI; Syntactic complexity; Syntax
URL: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_98.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.688.5035
BASE
Hide details
20
How Does the Mind Work? Insights from Biology
In: http://www.psych.nyu.edu/gary/marcusArticles/Marcus 2009 topics.pdf
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
20
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern