• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Khuder, B. (5)
    • Harwood, N. (2)
    • Petric, Bojana (2)
    • Bocanegra, A. (1)
    • Guillén, I. (1)
    • Petrić, Bojana (1)
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 5 of 5 1 Academic texts in motion: a text history study of co-authorship interactions in writing Khuder, B.; Petric, Bojana. - : John Benjamins Publishing, 2022 BASE Show details 2 Helping EAL academics navigate asymmetrical power relations in co-authorship: research-based materials for ERPP workshops Khuder, B.; Petric, Bojana. - : Equinox, 2022 BASE Show details 3 Walking on thin ice: reflexivity in doing ethnography Khuder, B.; Petrić, Bojana. - : John Benjamins, 2021 BASE Show details 4 L2 writing task representation in test-like and non-test-like situations Khuder, B.; Harwood, N.. - : SAGE Publications, 2019 BASE Show details 5 L2 writing in test and non-test situations: Process and product Khuder, B.; Harwood, N.. - : Universiteit Antwerpen, 2015 Abstract: Test writers sometimes complain they cannot perform to their true abilities because of time constraints. We therefore examined differences in terms of process and product between texts produced under test and non-test conditions. Ten L2 postgraduates wrote two argumentative essays, one under test conditions, with only forty minutes being allowed and without recourse to resources, and one under non-test conditions, with unlimited time as well as access to the Internet. Keystroke logging, screen capture software, and stimulated recall protocols were used, participants explaining and commenting on their writing processes. Sixteen writing process ttypes were identified. Higher proportions of the processes of translation and surface revision were recorded in the test situation, while meaningful revision and evaluation were both higher in the non-test situation. There was a statistically significant difference between time allocation for different processes at different stages. Experienced teachers awarded the non-test texts a mean score of almost one point (0.8) higher. A correlational analysis examining the relationship between writing process and product quality showed that while the distribution of writing processes can have an impact on text quality in the test situation, it had no effect on the product in the non-testt situation. URL: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/95238/1/Khuder%20%26%20Harwood%20JoWR.pdf http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/95238/ https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.06.03.2 BASE Hide details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 5 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0