DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...126
Hits 81 – 100 of 2.516

81
Argumentation Theoretical Frameworks for Explainable Artificial Intelligence ...
BASE
Show details
82
‘I interact therefore I am’ ... : human becoming in and through social interaction ...
Bolis, Dimitrios. - : Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2020
BASE
Show details
83
Argumentation Theoretical Frameworks for Explainable Artificial Intelligence ...
BASE
Show details
84
РОЛЬ ИНФЕРЕНЦИИ ИМПЛИКАТУР В РЕЧЕМЫСЛИТЕЛЬНОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ... : ROLE OF INFERENCE OF IMPLICATURES IN VERBAL AND COGITATIVE ACTIVITY ...
Смерчинская Анастасия Александровна. - : Научные исследования и инновации, 2020
BASE
Show details
85
Detecting deviations from activities of daily living routines using kinect depth maps and power consumption data
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
BASE
Show details
86
Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis: ; A Review and Comparison of the Toulmin Model, Pragma-Dialectics, Political Discourse Analysis, and Argumentum Model of Topics
BASE
Show details
87
NUIG at TIAD: Combining unsupervised NLP and graph metrics for translation inference
Arcan, Mihael; McCrae, John P.. - : European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2020
BASE
Show details
88
DMGoldstein/NoEscapingPhylogenetics: Data and code ...
Goldstein, David. - : Zenodo, 2020
BASE
Show details
89
DMGoldstein/NoEscapingPhylogenetics: Data and code ...
Goldstein, David. - : Zenodo, 2020
BASE
Show details
90
A Parameterized Intuitionistic Type-2 Fuzzy Inference System with Particle Swarm Optimization
In: Symmetry ; Volume 12 ; Issue 4 (2020)
BASE
Show details
91
Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference System Based on Closest Point of Approach for Collision Avoidance between Ships
In: Applied Sciences ; Volume 10 ; Issue 11 (2020)
BASE
Show details
92
From Grammar Inference to Semantic Inference—An Evolutionary Approach
In: Mathematics ; Volume 8 ; Issue 5 (2020)
BASE
Show details
93
On the semantic change of evidential argument jakoby-clauses in Polish ...
Łukasz Jędrzejowski. - : Zenodo, 2020
BASE
Show details
94
On the semantic change of evidential argument jakoby-clauses in Polish ...
Łukasz Jędrzejowski. - : Zenodo, 2020
BASE
Show details
95
Supplementary data for the Master Thesis: Inferring Personality from GitHub Communication Data: Promises & Perils ...
van Mil, Frenk. - : 4TU.Centre for Research Data, 2020
BASE
Show details
96
"Kärnten" = Austria, "Koroška" = Yugoslavia? A Novel Perspective on the 1920 Carinthian Plebiscite
In: Historical Social Research ; 45 ; 4 ; 309-346 (2020)
BASE
Show details
97
Inferring behavior from partial social information plays little or no role in the cultural transmission of adaptive traits
BASE
Show details
98
Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of Natural Language Inference Models with Attention Mechanisms and External Knowledge
GAJBHIYE, AMIT. - 2020
BASE
Show details
99
Conjectural questions : The case of German verb-final wohl questions
In: Semantics and Pragmatics ; 13 (2020). - 9. - Linguistic Society of America. - eISSN 1937-8912 (2020)
Abstract: The paper analyzes German verb-final questions with the particle wohl, which roughly translate as ‘Q, I wonder?’. It construes German as an instance of a general typological pattern: Conjectural questions (CQs) are marked by evidentials in many languages, and German wohl is an inferential evidential. The analysis proceeds in three steps. First, wohl is shown to pattern with inferential evidentials in other languages. Declarative wohl p asserts p and conveys ‘the speaker defeasibly infers p from secure knowledge’ as non-at-issue content. Second, the analysis is extended to standard wohl Q questions, accounting for the interrogative flip. Third, the analysis integrates conjectural verb-final wohl questions. I propose that CQs ask for answers that are defeasibly entailed by the pooled knowledge of speaker and addressee. Due to the logic of defeasible inference, the addressee is not in a position to answer the CQ unless both interlocutors have pooled their knowledge. In normal utterance contexts, these questions are thus un-answerable. We see two conventionalized reactions: the interlocutors engage in speculative discourse, or the CQ is understood as a statement of curiosity that doesn’t require a response. ; published
Keyword: ddc:400; defeasible inference; evidentials; indexicals; interrogative flip; speaker orientation
URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1el9qmhxbto1l9
https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.13.9
BASE
Hide details
100
From Discursive Practice to Logic? Remarks on Logical Expressivism
In: Dialogue & Discourse; Vol 11 No 2 (2020); 34-73 ; 2152-9620 (2020)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...126

Catalogues
196
3
246
0
0
0
3
Bibliographies
1.697
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
787
1
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern