Home
Catalogue search
Refine your search:
Keyword
Creator / Publisher:
Perini, Anna (2)
Algorithmes, Composants, Modèles Et Services pour l'informatique répartie (ACMES-SAMOVAR) (1)
Département Informatique (INF) (1)
Fondazione Bruno Kessler Trento, Italy (FBK) (1)
Giunchiglia, Fausto (1)
Institut Mines-Télécom Paris (IMT)-Télécom SudParis (TSP) (1)
Institut Mines-Télécom Paris (IMT)-Télécom SudParis (TSP)-Institut Mines-Télécom Paris (IMT)-Télécom SudParis (TSP) (1)
Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris) (1)
Kifetew, Fitsum Meshesha (1)
Morales-Ramirez, Itzel (1)
more
Year
Medium
Type:
Article (1)
Miscellaneous (1)
BLLDB-Access
Search in the Catalogues and Directories
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
Sort by
creator [A → Z]
'
creator [Z → A]
'
publishing year ↑ (asc)
'
publishing year ↓ (desc)
'
title [A → Z]
'
title [Z → A]
'
Simple Search
Hits 1 – 2 of 2
1
Automating user-feedback driven requirements prioritization
Kifetew, Fitsum Meshesha
;
Perini, Anna
;
Susi, Angelo
;
Siena, Aberto
;
Muñante, Denisse
;
Morales-Ramirez, Itzel
In: ISSN: 0950-5849 ; EISSN: 1873-6025 ; Information and Software Technology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277970 ; Information and Software Technology, Elsevier, 2021, 138, pp.106635:1-106635:16. ⟨10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106635⟩ (2021)
Abstract:
International audience ; Context: Feedback from end users of software applications is a valuable resource in understanding what users request, what they value, and what they dislike. Information derived from user-feedback can support software evolution activities, such as requirements prioritization. User-feedback analysis is still mostly performed manually by practitioners, despite growing research in automated analysis. Objective: We address two issues in automated user-feedback analysis: (i) most of the existing automated analysis approaches that exploit linguistic analysis assume that the vocabulary adopted by users (when expressing feedback) and developers (when formulating requirements) are the same; and (ii) user-feedback analysis techniques are usually experimentally evaluated only on some user-feedback dataset, not involving assessment by potential software developers. Method: We propose an approach, ReFeed, that computes, for each requirement, the set of related user-feedback, and from such user-feedback extracts quantifiable properties which are relevant for prioritizing the requirement. The extracted properties are propagated to the related requirements, based on which ranks are computed for each requirement. ReFeed relies on domain knowledge, in the form of an ontology, helping mitigate the gap in the vocabulary of end users and developers. The effectiveness of ReFeed is evaluated on a realistic requirements prioritization scenario in two experiments involving graduate students from two different universities. Results: ReFeed is able to synthesize reasonable priorities for a given set of requirements based on properties derived from user-feedback. The implementation of ReFeed and related resources are publicly available. Conclusion: The results from our studies are encouraging in that using only three properties of user-feedback, ReFeed is able to prioritize requirements with reasonable accuracy. Such automatically determined prioritization could serve as a good starting point for requirements experts involved in the task of prioritizing requirements Future studies could explore additional user-feedback properties to improve the effectiveness of computed priorities.
Keyword:
[INFO.INFO-MO]Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation
;
[INFO.INFO-SE]Computer Science [cs]/Software Engineering [cs.SE]
;
Automated requirements prioritization
;
Automated user-feedback analysis
;
Empirical study
URL:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106635
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277970
BASE
Hide details
2
The Tropos Software Development Methodology: Processes, Models and Diagrams
Giunchiglia, Fausto
;
Perini, Anna
;
Mylopoulos, John
. - 2001
BASE
Show details
Mobile view
All
Catalogues
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
0
IDS Mannheim
0
OLC Linguistik
0
UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog
0
DNB Subject Category Language
0
Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft
0
Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS)
0
Bibliographies
BLLDB
0
BDSL
0
IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik
0
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
0
IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen
0
IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen
0
IDS OBELEX meta
0
MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection
0
MPI for Psycholinguistics
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
Annohub
0
Online resources
Link directory
0
Journal directory
0
Database directory
0
Dictionary directory
0
Open access documents
BASE
2
Linguistik-Repository
0
IDS Publikationsserver
0
Online dissertations
0
Language Description Heritage
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik
|
Imprint
|
Privacy Policy
|
Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern