DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 10 of 10

1
Language effects in early development of number writing and reading ...
BASE
Show details
2
Language effects in early development of number writing and reading
BASE
Show details
3
Common and distinct predictors of non-symbolic and symbolic ordinal number processing across the early primary school years
BASE
Show details
4
Neural patterns of word processing differ in children with dyslexia and isolated spelling deficit
In: Brain Struct Funct (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
Common and distinct predictors of non-symbolic and symbolic ordinal number processing across the early primary school years
In: PLoS One (2021)
BASE
Show details
6
Visual attention span performance in German-speaking children with differential reading and spelling profiles: No evidence of group differences
In: PLOS One (2018)
BASE
Show details
7
White matter alterations and tract lateralization in children with dyslexia and isolated spelling deficits
Banfi, Chiara; Koschutnig, Karl; Moll, Kristina. - : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018
BASE
Show details
8
Visuo-spatial cueing in children with differential reading and spelling profiles
In: PLOS One (2017)
BASE
Show details
9
Visuo-spatial cueing in children with differential reading and spelling profiles
Banfi, Chiara; Kemény, Ferenc; Gangl, Melanie. - : Public Library of Science, 2017
BASE
Show details
10
Lexical Reading in Dysfluent Readers of German
Abstract: Dyslexia in consistent orthographies like German is characterized by dysfluent reading, which is often assumed to result from failure to build up an orthographic lexicon and overreliance on decoding. However, earlier evidence indicates effects of lexical processing at least in some German dyslexic readers. We investigated variations in reading style in an eye-tracking paradigm with German dysfluent 3rd and 4th graders. Twenty-six TypFix-readers (fixation counts within the range of 47 age-matched typical readers) were compared with 42 HighFix-readers (increased fixation counts). Both groups showed lexical access: Words were read more efficiently than nonwords and pseudohomophones. TypFix-readers showed stronger reliance on lexical reading than HighFix-readers (smaller length effects for number of fixations and total reading time, stronger lexicality effects for gaze duration, stronger word-pseudohomophone effects for mean saccade amplitude). We conclude that in both groups, sublexical and lexical reading processes were impaired due to inefficient visual-verbal integration.
Keyword: Original Articles
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1339709
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5714164/
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
10
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern