• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword:
    
    • Aphasia (11)
    • 1203 Language and Linguistics (7)
    • 3310 Linguistics and Language (7)
    • Aphasie (7)
    • 2912 LPN and LVN (6)
    • 2728 Clinical Neurology (5)
    • 2808 Neurology (5)
    • 2733 Otorhinolaryngology (4)
    • 3204 Developmental and Educational Psychology (4)
    • Clinical Neurology (4)
    •   more
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Cruice, Madeline (53)
    • Worrall, Linda (27)
    • Hickson, Louise (17)
    • Marshall, Jane (14)
    • Hersh, Deborah (12)
    • Hilari, Katerina (8)
    • Wallace, Sarah J. (7)
    • Monnelly, Katie (6)
    • Botting, Nicola (5)
    • Breitenstein, Caterina (5)
    •   more
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Page: 1 2 3 Hits 1 – 20 of 57 1 An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists Ali, Myzoon; Hilari, Katerina; Martinez-Ferreiro, Silvia... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022) BASE Show details 2 Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia Cruice, Madeline; Boyle, Mary; Hersh, Deborah... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021) BASE Show details 3 Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base Dipper, Lucy; Marshall, Jane; Boyle, Mary... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021) BASE Show details 4 Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ... Monnelly, Katie; Marshall, Jane; Cruice, Madeline. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 5 Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions ... Monnelly, Katie; Marshall, Jane; Cruice, Madeline. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 6 Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes Wray, Faye; Clarke, David; Cruice, Madeline... In: PLoS One (2021) BASE Show details 7 Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia Bacon, Katharine; Marshall, Jane; Caute, Anna. - : Wiley, 2021 BASE Show details 8 Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers. Caute, Anna; Cruice, Madeline; Devane, Niamh. - : Taylor and Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 9 Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia Cruice, Madeline; Woolf, Celia; Caute, Anna. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021 BASE Show details 10 Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia Dipper, Lucy; Marshall, Jane; Boyle, Mary... In: Brain Sci (2021) BASE Show details 11 Assessing Parent Behaviours in Parent–Child Interactions with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Infants Aged 0–3 Years: A Systematic Review Curtin, Martina; Dirks, Evelien; Cruice, Madeline... In: J Clin Med (2021) BASE Show details 12 Assessing Parent-Child Interaction in Infant Deafness Curtin, Martina; Herman, Ros; Cruice, Madeline... In: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2021) BASE Show details 13 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Ali, Myzoon; Soroli, Efstathia; Jesus, Luis M. T.... In: Ali, Myzoon Soroli, Efstathia Jesus, Luis M. T. Cruice, Madeline Isaksen, Jytte Visch-Brink, Evy Grohmann, Kleanthes K. Jagoe, C. Kukkonen, Tarja Varlokosta, Spyridoula Hernández Sacristán, Carlos Rosell Clari, Vicent Palmer, Rebecca Martinez Ferreiro, Silvia Godecke, Erin Wallace, Sarah J. McMenamin, Ruth Copland, David Breitenstein, Caterina Bowen, Audrey Laska, Ann-Charlotte Hilari, Katerina Brady, Marian C. 2021 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Aphasiology 1 21 (2021) BASE Show details 14 UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation Cruice, Madeline; Botting, Nicola; Marshall, Jane; Boyle, Mary; Hersh, Deborah; Pritchard, Madeleine; Dipper, Lucy In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020) Abstract: BACKGROUND: Discourse assessment and treatment in aphasia rehabilitation is a priority focus for a range of stakeholder groups. However, a significant majority of speech and language therapists (SLTs) infrequently conduct discourse analysis, and do not feel competent in doing so. Known barriers identified in other countries, specifically a lack of time, training, expertise and resources, affect use of discourse analysis in clinical practice. AIMS: To investigate UK SLTs' reported practices and views of discourse analysis, barriers and facilitators, and clinical feasibility in aphasia rehabilitation. METHODS & PROCEDURES: An online survey of 52 questions adapted from existing research and incorporating behaviour change literature was created for the study and piloted. UK SLTs working in aphasia rehabilitation for at least 6 months were invited to participate. Potential participants were contacted through national and local clinical excellence networks, a National Health Service (NHS) bespoke e-mail list, and national magazine advertisement, and the study was also advertised on social media (Twitter). Therapists read an online participant information sheet and submitted individual electronic consent online; then progressed to the Qualtrics survey. Descriptive, correlational and inferential statistical analyses were conducted, and content analysis was carried out on the questions requiring text. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A total of 211 valid responses were received from primarily female SLTs, aged 20-40 years, working full-time in the NHS in England, in community, inpatient and acute/subacute multidisciplinary settings. A total of 30% SLTs collected discourse analysis often, were mostly very experienced, and working part-time in community settings. Years of experience was predictive of use. Discourse was most often collected using standardized picture descriptions and recounts during initial assessment. Samples were infrequently recorded, and typically transcribed in real-time. Most SLTs (53-95%) reported making clinical judgements or manually counted words, sentences, communication of ideas and errors, and were confident in doing so. Barriers included time constraints; lack of expertise, confidence, training, resources and equipment; and patient severity. Discourse 'super-users' were distinguished by significantly higher professional motivation for discourse and workplace opportunity than other SLTs, and 'non-users' were distinguished by significantly less knowledge and skills in discourse analysis than other SLTs. SLTs reported a desire and need for training, new/assistive tools and time to do more discourse analysis in practice. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians were highly engaged and relatively active in at least some aspects of discourse analysis practice. Interventions that target individual clinicians as well as organizations and systems are needed to improve the uptake of discourse analysis in practice. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject? Discourse in aphasia rehabilitation is a priority in clinical practice and research. However, the majority of clinicians infrequently collect and analyse discourse. Research in Australia and the United States indicated that lack of time, assessment resources and relevant knowledge and skills are the main barriers to use. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Compared with existing research, UK SLTs were more likely to see discourse analysis as part of their role and experienced fewer barriers, and more SLTs did it at least sometimes in clinic. However, practices were limited by lack of training, giving rise to challenges in selecting and interpreting findings for clients. More use was predicted by more experience and commitment to discourse analysis, particularly where workplaces supported this approach. Less use was associated with less knowledge and skills in discourse analysis. Practice and decision-making were influenced by client factors and constrained to a lesser degree by logistical challenges. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this study? Education and training in discourse analyses and in specific procedures are needed to improve individual clinicians' knowledge, skills and confidence in using discourse analysis for clients' rehabilitation. Equally, organizational and systems changes are needed to promote, support and reinforce discourse analysis in the workplace. © 2020 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Keyword: aphasia; clinical practice; discourse analysis; Medicine and Health Sciences; speech and language therapist; survey URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/8108 https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12528 BASE Hide details 15 Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers Berg, Karianne; Isaksen, Jytte; Wallace, Sarah J.. - : Routledge, 2020 BASE Show details 16 A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019) BASE Show details 17 Technology‐enhanced reading therapy for people with aphasia: findings from a quasi‐randomized waitlist controlled study Caute, Anna; Woolf, Celia; Wilson, Stephanie. - : American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2019 BASE Show details 18 Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: results of a quasi-randomized waitlist controlled study Marshall, Jane; Caute, Anna; Chadd, Katie. - : Wiley, 2019 BASE Show details 19 Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries Trebilcock, Megan; Worrall, Linda; Ryan, Brooke. - : Routledge, 2019 BASE Show details 20 Reporting interventions in communication partner training: a critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature Cruice, Madeline; Blom Johansson, Monica; Isaksen, Jytte. - 2018 BASE Show details Page: 1 2 3

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 12 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 11 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 1 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 37 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0