1 |
The Effects of Onset and Offset Masking on the Time Course of Non-Native Spoken-Word Recognition in Noise ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The Effects of Onset and Offset Masking on the Time Course of Non-Native Spoken-Word Recognition in Noise ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Lexicalization of new English words in Italian-English bilinguals ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
A behavioural dataset for studying individual differences in language skills 2019 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Perception of English phonetic contrasts by Dutch children: How bilingual are early-English learners?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Adult dyslexic readers benefit less from visual input during audiovisual speech processing:fMRI evidence
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A General Audiovisual Temporal Processing Deficit in Adult Readers With Dyslexia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Beyond the usual cognitive suspects:The importance of speechreading and audiovisual temporal sensitivity in reading ability
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Mapping the Speech Code: Cortical Responses Linking the Perception and Production of Vowels
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Speech perception involves prediction, but how is that prediction implemented? In cognitive models prediction has often been taken to imply that there is feedback of activation from lexical to pre-lexical processes as implemented in interactive-activation models (IAMs). We show that simple activation feedback does not actually improve speech recognition. However, other forms of feedback can be beneficial. In particular, feedback can enable the listener to adapt to changing input, and can potentially help the listener to recognise unusual input, or recognise speech in the presence of competing sounds. The common feature of these helpful forms of feedback is that they are all ways of optimising the performance of speech recognition using Bayesian inference. That is, listeners make predictions about speech because speech recognition is optimal in the sense captured in Bayesian models.
|
|
Keyword:
Original Articles
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4685608/ https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1081703
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Effects of auditory feedback consistency on vowel production ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Effects of auditory feedback consistency on vowel production ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|