21 |
LA VARIACIÓN LINGÜÍSTICA EN CONTEXTOS ESPECIALIZADOS: VARIEDADES DIATÓPICAS Y DIASTRÁTICAS EN LA EVALUACIÓN E INTERVENCIÓN DEL LENGUAJE
|
|
|
|
In: Tonos Digital; NÚMERO 36 - ENERO 2019 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
Using Rater Cognition to Improve Generalizability of an Assessment of Scientific Argumentation
|
|
|
|
In: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Evaluating Classroom Communication: In Support of Emergent and Authentic Frameworks in Second Language Assessment
|
|
|
|
In: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
Effects of Handwriting and Computer-Print on Composition Scores: A Follow-up to Powers, Fowles, Farnum, & Ramsey
|
|
|
|
In: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Formative Use of Assessment Information: It’s a Process, So Let’s Say What We Mean
|
|
|
|
In: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
27 |
Effects of Removing the Time Limit on First and Second Language Intelligence Test Performance
|
|
|
|
In: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Linguistic Simplification: A Promising Test Accommodation for LEP Students?
|
|
|
|
In: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
S8-II - Situational Eight-II - deutsche Fassung ... : Big Eight DIAMONDS; The Situational Big Eight DIAMONDS ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Der S8-II ist eine von vier Ultrakurzversionen des Situational Eight DIAMONDS (S8*; Rauthmann & Sherman, 2016a) und dient der Erfassung situationaler Eigenschaften. Der S8-II wird in erster Linie in der Forschung eingesetzt. Für jede Skala des S8-II wird ein Item vorgegeben, sodass das Verfahren aus insgesamt acht Items besteht. Jedes Item ist aus drei Nomen zusammengesetzt und soll auf einer siebenstufigen Ratingskala beantwortet werden. Aus den Skalennamen (1) Duty, (2) Intellect, (3) Adversity, (4) Mating, (5) pOsitivity, (6) Negativity, (7) Deception und (8) Sociality wurde der Name DIAMONDS gebildet. Reliabilität: Es fehlen Angaben zur Reliabilität. Validität: Die Konstruktvalidität wurde untersucht. Dabei wurden alle Kurzvarianten (S8-I, S8-III-A, S8-III-P) sowie der S8* untereinander korreliert. Die höchsten Korrelationen ergaben sich erwartungsgemäß mit der korrespondierenden Skala. ... : The S8-II is one of four ultrashort versions of the Situational Eight DIAMOND (S8*; Rauthmann & Sherman, 2016) and is used to measure situational characteristics. The S8-II is primarily used in research. For each scale of the S8-II one item is given, so that the measure consists of a total of eight items. Each item is composed of three nouns and is to be answered on a seven-level rating scale. The scale names (1) Duty, (2) Intellect, (3) Adversity, (4) Mating, (5) pOsitivity, (6) Negativity, (7) Deception and (8) Sociality were used to form the name DIAMONDS. Reliability: Information on reliability is missing. Validity: The construct validity was examined. All short variants (S8-I, S8-III-A, S8-III-P) and the S8* were correlated with each other. As expected, the highest correlations were found with the corresponding scale. ...
|
|
Keyword:
150; Adolescence; Adulthood; Classical Test Theory; Cognitive Processes; Commitment; Deception; Emotionen; Emotions; Erwachsenenalter; Five Factor Personality Model; Fragebögen; Fünffaktorenmodell der Persönlichkeit; Item Response Theory; Item-Response-Theorie; Jugendalter; Klassische Testtheorie; Kognitive Prozesse; Perception; Questionnaires; Rating Scales; Rating-Skalen; Selbsteinschätzung; Self-Evaluation; Social Interaction; Soziale Interaktion; Täuschen; Verpflichtung; Wahrnehmung
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.824 https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/620
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
30 |
The Relationship between English Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement for English Language Learners
|
|
|
|
In: Doctoral Dissertations and Projects (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Comment évaluer objectivement le bilinguisme en terme quantitatif ? Question de la validité de l’évaluation du lexique des enfants bilingues à partir d’une batterie de test étrangère
|
|
|
|
In: Journées d’études du Réseau d’Acquisition des Langues Secondes (RéAL2) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02366427 ; Journées d’études du Réseau d’Acquisition des Langues Secondes (RéAL2), Université Paris 8, Nov 2017, Paris, France (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
35 |
Building a multilingual test collection for metadata records
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
Comment évaluer la théorie de l’esprit? Revue systématique des outils d’évaluation destinés aux enfants d’âge préscolaire
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
38 |
The Washback of the TOEFL iBT in Vietnam
|
|
|
|
In: Australian Journal of Teacher Education (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
39 |
High School GPA and English Graduation Examinations: Predicting College English Placement and English 101 Final Course Grades
|
|
|
|
In: Doctoral Dissertations and Projects (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
40 |
Correlating English Language Learner CRCT Scores on the Basis of English Language Learner ACCESS Scores
|
|
|
|
In: Doctoral Dissertations and Projects (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|