Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7... 103
| 43 |
Generation of TypeScript Declaration Files from JavaScript Code ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 45 |
A Logical Programming Language as an Instrument for Specifying and Verifying Dynamic Memory ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 48 |
Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Cultures ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 49 |
Automatic Grading Tool for Jupyter Notebooks in Artificial Intelligence Courses
|
|
|
|
In: Sustainability ; Volume 13 ; Issue 21 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 50 |
Studying the Effectiveness of Code Animation in Teaching Recursive Programming
|
|
|
|
In: Honors College Theses (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 52 |
Why Aren't Regular Expressions a Lingua Franca? An Empirical Study on the Re-use and Portability of Regular Expressions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 53 |
TreeBERT: A Tree-Based Pre-Trained Model for Programming Language ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 54 |
Query Lifting: Language-integrated query for heterogeneous nested collections ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 55 |
Evolution of human computer interaction
|
|
|
|
In: Sci. Visualization ; Scientific Visualization (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 56 |
Conversational agent for supporting learners on a MOOC on programming with Java
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 57 |
Identifying and solving issues with acquiring skills in computer programming for non-English speakers
|
|
|
|
In: Nnass, IA, (2020). Identifying and solving issues with acquiring skills in computer programming for non-English speakers. Doctoral Thesis. Central Queensland University, http://dx.doi.org/10.25946/5f039502e1dec (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 58 |
PROGRAMMER EN MAX AVEC bell
|
|
|
|
In: Journées d'informatique musicale (JIM) 2020 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03019742 ; Journées d'informatique musicale (JIM) 2020, Oct 2020, Strasbourg (en virtuel), France (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 59 |
History of Logo
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, vol 4, iss HOPL (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 60 |
A Methodology for Teaching from Student Errors in Computer Science Education
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In education, many assessments boil down to getting the correct solution or necessary result to receive credit. This end goal mentality, in turn, influences how educators transfer knowledge to students. For example, some educators may present or walk through completed solutions. However, continually displaying and using worked-out solutions to teach can quickly become an obstruction to learning. In computer science, a significant amount of learning occurs while fixing the errors that litter the pathway from a blank page to a working solution. This dissertation establishes a methodology for teaching from student errors in computer science.The first part of the dissertation establishes how we developed over fifty lightweight exercises to integrate into a ten-week course without content replacement. Using past research in computer science, education theory, and cognitive load theory, we developed and refined a standard exercise structure that incorporates student submissions containing erroneous code, past student solutions presented during student-instructor interactions, and instructor feedback. Collectively, our core exercises are known as "What's Wrong With My Code" exercises.Next, we evaluated the "What's Wrong With My Code" exercises in three distinct ways. First, we performed a study to assess student improvement when using our exercises in place of current course activities (e.g., CodeLab). Second, we analyzed the differences in student error encounters for an entire term by comparing error counts in prior course offerings to offerings with our exercises integrated into the weekly course workload. Lastly, we evaluated student self-efficacy improvements over an entire term by comparing offerings with and without our exercises. In each of the studies, our exercises proved beneficial with increased student performance (with effect sizes of 0.56 and 0.42), increased self-efficacy (p-value < 0.05), and diminished student error encounter rates.Finally, we used our methodology to implement additional exercises to demonstrate a pathway for use beyond common errors. Specifically, we developed exercises to teach programming style in an introductory C++ computer science course. We evaluated the style exercises alongside data from seven years of submissions, which spanned four different instructional methods of teaching programming style. Our research concludes that students showed increased use of proper programming style before receiving any assessment feedback in academic terms that utilized our exercises. Additionally, we discovered that using an automatic assessment tool with an assigned style grade significantly improves the use of proper programming style.This dissertation creates a methodology for teaching from student errors in any computer science course, utilizes the methodology to provide multiple implementations and use case examples for an introductory computer science course in C++, and suggests concrete changes for computer science course instructors.
|
|
Keyword:
Computer science; computer science education; CS1; Educational evaluation; Educational technology; erroneous code; programming
|
|
URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9x472353
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7... 103 |
|
