1 |
Now You Hear Me, Later You Don’t: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Now You Hear Me, Later You Don’t: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_0956797620968787 – Supplemental material for Now You Hear Me, Later You Don’t: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
sj-pdf-1-pss-10.1177_0956797620968787 – Supplemental material for Now You Hear Me, Later You Don’t: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
How children attend to events before speaking: crosslinguistic evidence from the motion domain
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 6, No 1 (2021); 28 ; 2397-1835 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Top-Down Grouping Affects Adjacent Dependency Learning
|
|
|
|
In: Psychology Faculty Publications (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Studying the Real-Time Interpretation of Novel Noun and Verb Meanings in Young Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Spotting Dalmatians: Children’s ability to discover subordinate-level word meanings cross-situationally
|
|
|
|
In: Cogn Psychol (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
Even when children encounter a novel word in the situation of a clear and unique referent, they are nevertheless faced with the problem of semantic uncertainty: when “puziv” refers to a co-present spotted dog, does the word mean Fido, Dalmatian, dog, animal, or entity? Here we explored the extent to which children (3 to 5 years of age) can reason about a novel word’s meaning from information they have gathered cross-situationally, from a series of simple ostensive labeling events (“I see a puziv!”). Of particular interest were the conditions under which children arrive at a subordinate level meaning (e.g., Dalmatian) rather than a basic level meaning (e.g., dog). Experiment 1 showed that children (N=32) were capable of using lexical contrast and/or mutual exclusivity cross-situationally, such that they arrived at subordinate level meanings only when the words being learned contrasted at the subordinate level, otherwise they strongly preferred basic level meanings (e.g., dog) even when the word had previously referred to subordinate level exemplars (always Dalmatians). Experiment 2 showed that children in this same age range (N=20) can also arrive at subordinate level meanings cross-situationally when offered relatively minimal linguistic support (“It’s a kind of dog.”). The findings are interpreted with respect to current theories of cross-situational word learning, and suggest that word meanings rather than sets of referential exemplars are tracked and used for cross-situational comparison.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925454/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31310895 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101226
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Auditory word recognition of verbs: Effects of verb argument structure on referent identification
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Two- and three-year-olds track a single meaning during word learning: Evidence for Propose-but-verify
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
A learned label modulates object representations in 10-month-old infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
The interplay of local attraction, context and domain-general cognitive control in activation and suppression of semantic distractors during sentence comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Taking your own path: Individual differences in Executive Function and Language Processing Skills in Child Learners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Perceiving referential intent: Dynamics of reference in natural parent-child interactions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Semantic ambiguity and syntactic bootstrapping: The case of conjoined-subject intransitive sentences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Revise and resubmit: How real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Compositionality and the angular gyrus: a multi-voxel similarity analysis of the semantic composition of nouns and verbs
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis of Noun and Verb Differences in Ventral Temporal Cortex Marked Revision
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|