1 |
Coliving housing : home cultures of precarity for the new creative class
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Fidelity protocol for the Action Success Knowledge (ASK) trial: a psychosocial intervention administered by speech and language therapists to prevent depression in people with post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: exploring the first year
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Although much is known about discourse impairment, little is known about discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). This paper explores discourse recovery across the critical first year, controlling for pre-injury, injury and post-injury variables. DESIGN AND METHODS: An inception cohort comprising 57 participants with severe TBI was examined at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury and compared to a cross-section of matched healthy control participants. A narrative discourse task was analyzed with main concept analysis (MCA). A mixed linear model approach was used to track recovery controlling for pre-injury, injury and post-injury variables. RESULTS: An upward trajectory of recovery was observed, with peak periods of improvement between 3–6 and 9–12 months and all time points were significantly below controls. Years of education and PTA duration were significant covariates in the recovery model. Presence of aphasia also influenced the recovery model. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with TBI typically improve over the first year, however many will continue to have discourse deficits at 12 months. Years of education, PTA duration and aphasia should be considered when planning services. The 3–6- and 9–12-month periods may offer optimal periods for discourse recovery and increased supports may be beneficial between 6-9 months.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30465440 https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1539246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906198/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
6 |
Implementing aphasia recommendations in the acute setting: speech-language pathologists' perspectives of a behaviour change intervention
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Fidelity protocol for the Action Success Knowledge (ASK) trial: a psychosocial intervention administered by speech and language therapists to prevent depression in people with post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury : exploring the first year
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
A how-to guide to aphasia services: celebrating Professor Linda Worrall’s contribution to the field
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Fidelity protocol for the Action Success Knowledge (ASK) trial: a psychosocial intervention administered by speech and language therapists to prevent depression in people with post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Implementing aphasia recommendations in the acute setting: speech-language pathologists’ perspectives of a behaviour change intervention
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice?
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Factors that influence Australian speech-language pathologists’ self-reported uptake of aphasia rehabilitation recommendations from clinical practice guidelines
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Closing the evidence-practice gaps in aphasia management: are we there yet? Where has a decade of implementation research taken us? A review and guide for clinicians
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Cognitive-communication and psychosocial functioning 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Closing the evidence-practice gaps in aphasia management: are we there yet? Where has a decade of implementation research taken us? A review and guide for clinicians
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|