1 |
Coliving housing : home cultures of precarity for the new creative class
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Fidelity protocol for the Action Success Knowledge (ASK) trial: a psychosocial intervention administered by speech and language therapists to prevent depression in people with post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: exploring the first year
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Implementing aphasia recommendations in the acute setting: speech-language pathologists' perspectives of a behaviour change intervention
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Fidelity protocol for the Action Success Knowledge (ASK) trial: a psychosocial intervention administered by speech and language therapists to prevent depression in people with post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury : exploring the first year
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
A how-to guide to aphasia services: celebrating Professor Linda Worrall’s contribution to the field
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Fidelity protocol for the Action Success Knowledge (ASK) trial: a psychosocial intervention administered by speech and language therapists to prevent depression in people with post-stroke aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Implementing aphasia recommendations in the acute setting: speech-language pathologists’ perspectives of a behaviour change intervention
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice?
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Factors that influence Australian speech-language pathologists’ self-reported uptake of aphasia rehabilitation recommendations from clinical practice guidelines
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Closing the evidence-practice gaps in aphasia management: are we there yet? Where has a decade of implementation research taken us? A review and guide for clinicians
|
|
|
|
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury
|
|
Stubbs, Elin; Togher, Leanne; Kenny, Belinda; Fromm, Davida; Forbes, Margaret; MacWhinney, Brian; McDonald, Skye; Tate, Robyn; Turkstra, Lyn; Power, Emma
|
|
In: Brain Inj (2018)
|
|
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: There is limited research on communicative recovery during the early stages after a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In the current study 43 people with severe TBI described a simple procedure at 3 and 6 months post injury and this was compared to the description provided by 37 healthy speakers. Linguistic productivity and the presence of macrostructural discourse elements were analysed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: No change occurred in productivity in the TBI group between the two time points. There was increased use of relevant information (macrostructure) over time for the TBI group, reflecting improvement. People with TBI differed from controls in speech rate and in two out of three macrostructural categories at both time points, indicating difficulties even after 12 weeks of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality, rather than the quantity of discourse was disordered for participants with TBI. Findings indicate that procedural discourse is sensitive to discourse deficits of people with TBI and can be used to map recovery during the sub-acute phase.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1291989 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903072/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29281420
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Procedural discourse performance in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at 3 and 6 months post injury
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Cognitive-communication and psychosocial functioning 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Closing the evidence-practice gaps in aphasia management: are we there yet? Where has a decade of implementation research taken us? A review and guide for clinicians
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|