1 |
The Source of Palm Orientation Errors in the Signing of Children with ASD: Imitative, Motoric, or Both?
|
|
|
|
In: Brain Sci (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The origins of Russian-Tajik Sign Language : investigating the historical sources and transmission of a signed language in Tajikistan
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Lexical conventionalization and the emergence of grammatical devices in a second generation homesign system in Peru
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The morphology of first-person object forms of directional verbs in ASL
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 3, No 1 (2018); 114 ; 2397-1835 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Learning an Embodied Visual Language: Four Imitation Strategies Available to Sign Learners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Sign Language Echolalia in Deaf Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Universal quantification in the nominal domain in American Sign Language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Points of comparison : what indicating gestures tell us about the origins of signs in San Juan Quiahije Chatino sign language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The syntax and semantics of resultative constructions in Deutsche Gebärdensprache (DGS) and American Sign Language (ASL)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Reproducible Research in Linguistics: A Position Statement on Data Citation and Attribution in Our Field
|
|
|
|
In: Linguistics, 2017. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
"Making hands" : family sign languages in the San Juan Quiahije community
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Sign order and argument structure in a Peruvian home sign system
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Cross-language speech perception in context : advantages for recent language learners and variation across language-specific acoustic cues
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Teaching ASL fingerspelling to second-language learners : explicit versus implicit phonetic training
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The Use of Sign Language Pronouns by Native-Signing Children with Autism
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Strict vs. flexible accomplishment predicates
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
text ; The central issue of this study is how predicates in English and ASL represent the completeness of events. The standard view is that predicates which are composed of dynamic verbs with quantized arguments denote the reaching of a natural endpoint (Vendler (1957), Dowty (1979), Smith (1991), Verkuyl (1993), Krifka (1998)). A consequence of this view is that sentences with dynamic verbs and quantized arguments are false when they refer to non-completed events. For example, if John ate only half of a sandwich, the sentence John ate a sandwich is false as it applies to this event. Some researchers have questioned whether this standard view matches native speaker intuitions (Lin (2004), Smollett (2005)). It is my hypothesis that the lexical aspectual category of accomplishments (those which have an obligatory preparatory phase and a natural endpoint) can be subdivided into strict accomplishments, those that require event completion (endpoint inclusion) in their truth conditions and flexible accomplishments, those which do not. This study addresses the following questions. (1) Do dynamic verb/quantized argument predicates entail endpoint inclusion? (2) Is there an inference, as opposed to an entailment, of endpoint-inclusion in English and ASL? If so what is the nature of this inference? (3) Is there a conceptual property that underlies the membership of predicates in the hypothesized class of flexible accomplishments? Three experiments were conducted in the course of this study to address these questions. The data gathered were analyzed in the light of the standard aspectuality literature. The following conclusions were reached: (1) The endpoint-inclusion inference in English is a conversational implicature, not an entailment. (2) Events which consist of iterated “minimal events” (Rothstein, 2004) are flexible accomplishments; however, not all flexible accomplishments consist of iterated minimal events. (4) ASL dynamic verb/quantized argument predicates lack the endpoint-inclusion inference due to their explicit iconic reference to minimal events. (5) The endpoint-inclusion inference of flexible accomplishments in English is due to a basic inference that the action of the verb in dynamic verb/quantized argument predicates covers/affects the whole extent of an object/path/scale, but specific world knowledge in the form of stereotypicality features outranks this inference. ; Linguistics
|
|
Keyword:
American Sign Language; English; Incompleteness effect; Lexical aspect; Minimal events; Variable telicity
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2152/31483 https://doi.org/10.15781/T2R30X
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
Typicality in Chinese sentence processing : evidence from offline judgment and online self-paced reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Verb agreement, negation, and aspectual marking in Egyptian sign language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|