• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium:
    
    • Online (115)
    • Print (26)
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Page: 1 2 3 4 5...8 Hits 1 – 20 of 141 1 A pilot economic evaluation of a feasibility trial for SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) for post-stroke aphasia Flood, C.; Behn, N.; Marshall, J.. - : SAGE Publications, 2022 BASE Show details 2 Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists Hersh, D.; Scarth, L.; Bannister, J.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2021 BASE Show details 3 Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions Monnelly, K.; Marshall, J.; Cruice, M.. - : Taylor and Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 4 Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia Boyle, M.; Botting, N.; Cruice, M.. - : MDPI, 2021 BASE Show details 5 ‘Emotion is of the essence. … Number one priority’: A nested qualitative study exploring psychosocial adjustment to stroke and aphasia Simpson, A.; McVicker, S.; Behn, N.. - : Wiley, 2021 BASE Show details 6 "Loneliness can also kill:" a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others Hilari, K.; Flood, C.; Marshall, J.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 7 "For them and for me": a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders' experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial Northcott, S.; Behn, N.; Monnelly, K.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 8 SUpporting wellbeing through PEeR-Befriending (SUPERB) feasibility trial: fidelity of peer-befriending for people with aphasia Behn, N.; Moss, B.; McVicker, S.. - : BMJ Publishing Group, 2021 BASE Show details 9 Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers Caute, A.; Cruice, M.; Devane, N.. - 2021 BASE Show details 10 Treatment fidelity of technology-enhanced reading therapy (CommuniCATE) for people with aphasia Marshall, J.; Moutou, C.; Caute, A.. - : Wiley, 2021 BASE Show details 11 Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial Behn, N.; McVicker, S.; Simpson, A.. - : SAGE Publications, 2021 BASE Show details 12 Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists Cruice, M.; Pritchard, M.; Bannister, J.... In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021) BASE Show details 13 “Loneliness can also kill:” a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others ... Moss, B.; Behn, N.; Northcott, S.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 14 “Loneliness can also kill:” a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others ... Moss, B.; Behn, N.; Northcott, S.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021 BASE Show details 15 “For them and for me”: a qualitative exploration of peer befrienders’ experiences supporting people with aphasia in the SUPERB feasibility trial Northcott, S.; Behn, N.; Monnelly, K.. - 2021 BASE Show details 16 Adjustment with aphasia after stroke: a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial for supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) Hilari, K.; Behn, N.; Marshall, J.. - : SAGE Publications, 2020 BASE Show details 17 Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base Dipper, L.; Marshall, J.; Boyle, M.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020 BASE Show details 18 UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation Cruice, M.; Botting, N.; Marshall, J.; Boyle, M.; Hersh, D.; Pritchard, M.; Dipper, L.. - : Wiley, 2020 Abstract: Background: Discourse assessment and treatment in aphasia rehabilitation is a priority focus for a range of stakeholder groups. However, a significant majority of speech and language therapists (SLTs) infrequently conduct discourse analysis, and do not feel competent in doing so. Known barriers identified in other countries, specifically a lack of time, training, expertise and resources, affect use of discourse analysis in clinical practice. Aims: This study investigates UK SLTs’ reported practices and views of discourse analysis, barriers and facilitators, and clinical feasibility in aphasia rehabilitation. Methods & Procedures: An online survey of 52 questions adapted from existing research and incorporating behaviour change literature was created for this study and piloted. UK SLTs working in aphasia rehabilitation for at least 6 months were invited to participate. Potential participants were contacted through national and local clinical excellence networks, a National Health Service (NHS) bespoke email list, national magazine advertisement, and the study was also advertised on social media (Twitter). Therapists read an online Participant Information Sheet and submitted individual electronic consent online; then progressed to the Qualtrics survey. Descriptive, correlational and inferential statistical analyses were conducted, and content analysis carried out on the questions requiring text. Outcomes & Results: 211 valid responses were received from primarily female SLTs, aged 20-40 years, working full-time in the NHS in England, in community, inpatient and acute/ subacute multidisciplinary settings. 30% SLTs collected discourse analysis often, were mostly very experienced, and working part-time in community settings. Years of experience was predictive of use. Discourse was most often collected using standardised picture descriptions and recounts during initial assessment. Samples were infrequently recorded, and typically transcribed in real-time. Most SLTs (53-95%) reported making clinical judgements or manually counted words, sentences, communication of ideas and errors, and were confident in doing so. Barriers included time constraints; lack of expertise, confidence, training, resources and equipment; and patient severity. Discourse ‘super-users’ were distinguished by significantly higher professional motivation for discourse and workplace opportunity than other SLTs, and ‘non-users’ were distinguished by significantly less knowledge and skills in discourse analysis than other SLTs. SLTs reported a desire and need for training, new/ assistive tools and time to do more discourse analysis in practice. Conclusions & Implications: Clinicians were highly engaged and relatively active in at least some aspects of discourse analysis practice. Interventions that target individual clinicians as well as organisations and systems are needed to improve the uptake of discourse analysis in practice. Keyword: P Philology. Linguistics; RC Internal medicine URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/23764/ https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/23764/10/LUNA%20Survey%20Paper_FINAL_ACCEPTED_ENTIRE%20MANSCRIPT_21022020.pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12528 BASE Hide details 19 Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia Cruice, M.; Woolf, C.; Caute, A.. - : Informa UK Limited, 2020 BASE Show details 20 CreaTable Content and Tangible Interaction in Aphasia Cruice, M.; Neate, T.; Marshall, J.. - : ACM, 2020 BASE Show details Page: 1 2 3 4 5...8

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 21 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 3 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 2 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 115 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0