DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...12
Hits 1 – 20 of 231

1
Word representation and processing in deaf readers: Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking
Lee, Brittany Alexandra. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2021
BASE
Show details
2
Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference ...
Emmorey, Karen; Mott, Megan; Meade, Gabriela. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference ...
Emmorey, Karen; Mott, Megan; Meade, Gabriela. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
4
How are iconic and non-iconic signs integrated into a lexicon for adult learners? ...
Emmorey, Karen. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language
In: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ (2021)
BASE
Show details
6
The organization of the American Sign Language lexicon: Comparing one- and two-parameter ERP phonological priming effects across tasks
In: Brain Lang (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
Environmentally-Coupled Signs and Gestures
In: J Cogn (2021)
BASE
Show details
8
Masked ERP repetition priming in deaf and hearing readers
In: Brain Lang (2021)
BASE
Show details
9
Teaching & Learning Guide for: The neurocognitive basis of skilled reading in prelingually and profoundly deaf adults
In: Lang Linguist Compass (2021)
BASE
Show details
10
The neurocognitive basis of skilled reading in prelingually and profoundly deaf adults
In: Lang Linguist Compass (2021)
BASE
Show details
11
Picture-naming in American Sign Language: an electrophysiological study of the effects of iconicity and structured alignment ...
McGarry, Meghan E.; Mott, Megan; Midgley, Katherine J.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2020
BASE
Show details
12
Picture-naming in American Sign Language: an electrophysiological study of the effects of iconicity and structured alignment ...
McGarry, Meghan E.; Mott, Megan; Midgley, Katherine J.. - : Taylor & Francis, 2020
BASE
Show details
13
ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A database of lexical and phonological properties for 2723 signs in American Sign Language ...
Sevcikova Sehyr, Zed; Caselli, Naomi; Cohen-Goldberg, Ariel. - : Open Science Framework, 2020
BASE
Show details
14
Neurophysiological Correlates of Frequency, Concreteness, and Iconicity in American Sign Language
In: Neurobiol Lang (Camb) (2020)
BASE
Show details
15
Cross-modal translation priming and iconicity effects in deaf signers and hearing learners of American Sign Language
In: Biling (Camb Engl) (2020)
BASE
Show details
16
Unique N170 signatures to words and faces in deaf ASL signers reflect experience-specific adaptations during early visual processing
In: Neuropsychologia (2020)
BASE
Show details
17
Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in hearing late learners of sign language
In: Hum Brain Mapp (2020)
BASE
Show details
18
Visual-Spatial Perspective-Taking in Spatial Scenes and in American Sign Language
In: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ (2020)
BASE
Show details
19
Sign Language: How the Brain Represents Phonology without Sound
In: Curr Biol (2020)
BASE
Show details
20
Shadowing in the Manual Modality
In: Acta Psychol (Amst) (2020)
Abstract: Motor simulation has emerged as a mechanism for both predictive action perception and language comprehension. By deriving a motor command, individuals can predictively represent the outcome of an unfolding action as a forward model. Evidence of simulation can be seen via improved participant performance for stimuli that conform to the participant’s individual characteristics (an egocentric bias). There is little evidence, however, from individuals for whom action and language take place in the same modality: sign language users. The present study asked signers and nonsigners to shadow (perform actions in tandem with various models), and the delay between the model and participant (“lag time”) served as an indicator of the strength of the predictive model (shorter lag time = more robust model). This design allowed us to examine the role of (a) motor simulation during action prediction, (b) linguistic status in predictive representations (i.e., pseudosigns vs. grooming gestures), and (c) language experience in generating predictions (i.e., signers vs. nonsigners). An egocentric bias was only observed under limited circumstances: when nonsigners began shadowing grooming gestures. The data do not support strong motor simulation proposals, and instead highlight the role of (a) production fluency and (b) manual rhythm for signer productions. Signers showed significantly faster lag times for the highly skilled pseudosign model and increased temporal regularity (i.e., lower standard deviations) compared to nonsigners. We conclude sign language experience may (a) reduce reliance on motor simulation during action observation, (b) attune users to prosodic cues (c) and induce temporal regularities during action production.
Keyword: Article
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531500
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103092
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387226/
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...12

Catalogues
8
1
41
0
2
0
0
Bibliographies
73
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
24
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
105
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern