| 4 |
The struggle for legitimacy: language provision in two 'residual' comprehensive high schools in Australia
|
|
|
|
In: Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers (Archive) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Languages discourses in Australian middle-class schools: parent and student perspectives
|
|
|
|
In: Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers (Archive) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Constructing learners as members of networks
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Networks are the sites through which social capital is generated. The number and the nature of memberships that people have in networks are indicators of the social capital that they can access. This chapter considers the possible consequences for pedagogy and even for what is valued as training outcomes if learners, in particular TVET learners, are seen as members of networks. The chapter begins with a discussion of what it means to conceptualize learners as members of networks. It then draws on research studies undertaken by the authors to identify the pedagogical strategies that seem to enhance the potential for social capital outcomes to occur for learners. It concludes with the kinds of social capital outcomes that learners can experience. Findings drawn on in this chapter are primarily from researching adult language, literacy and numeracy training. How educators view their adult learners affects how they teach and what they value as learning outcomes. Teachers can hold multiple, and sometimes even contradictory, conceptualizations of who their learners are in their courses and in the other contexts of their lives. Conceptualizations are many and range from the concrete to the metaphorical. Learners may be viewed as tradespeople or professionals 'in the making'; as problem solvers; as team members; as lifelong learners; as agents for change; as contributors to society; or as replacements for those who depart. The learning theories to which educators subscribe also lead to different conceptualizations of the learner - as an 'empty vessel', as a builder of knowledge, or as a co-constructor of knowledge in community with others. Deficit labels to do with ethnicity, gender and class can have educators refer to cohorts of learners as the 'socially excluded', the 'marginalized', and the 'disadvantaged'. In this chapter, we invite you to think about learners as members of networks or as having accesS to particular networks. Networks are the links among people which are activated for particular purposes. Networks exist in social units such as families, friendship groups, community groups, special interest groups, or in any collection of people that have some fonnal or infonnal association. To construct learners as members of networks focuses attention on the connections that learners mayor may not have with others and on what those connections might mean for their learning experience. To think of learners as members of networks or as having access to networks has implications for the pedagogical choices teachers make, and even for what they consider to be worthwhile outcomes for those who undertake the education and training they deliver.
|
|
URL: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/21208/2/21208_Balatti_et_al_2011_Book_cover.jpg
https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/21208/1/21208_Balatti_%26_Black_2011.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Reframing adult literacy and numeracy: a social capital perspective
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
