DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 20 of 20

1
Using automatic speech recognition to predict aided speech-in-noise intelligibility
In: Speech In Noise Workshop ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02960442 ; Speech In Noise Workshop, Jan 2020, Toulouse, France ; https://2020.speech-in-noise.eu/?p=program&id=105 (2020)
BASE
Show details
2
Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing
In: Journal of Clinical Medicine ; Volume 9 ; Issue 5 (2020)
BASE
Show details
3
The Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Noise and Reading Abilities
Moore, Hannah Rae. - : East Carolina University, 2019
BASE
Show details
4
the principle of inverse effectiveness in audiovisual speech perception ...
van de Rijt, Luuk; Roye, Anja; Mylanus, Emmanuel. - : Radboud University, 2019
BASE
Show details
5
Speech Recognition in Noise Performance in Younger and Older Spanish-English bilinguals' L1 and L2
In: Open Access Theses & Dissertations (2018)
BASE
Show details
6
Musical Training Influences Auditory Temporal Processing
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2016)
BASE
Show details
7
On The (Un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-Noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds
In: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY , 7 (ARTN 126) (2016) (2016)
BASE
Show details
8
Does Vocabulary Knowledge Affect Lexical Segmentation in Adverse Conditions? ...
Bishell, Michelle. - : University of Canterbury. Department of Communication Disorders, 2015
BASE
Show details
9
Does Vocabulary Knowledge Affect Lexical Segmentation in Adverse Conditions?
Bishell, Michelle. - : University of Canterbury. Department of Communication Disorders, 2015
BASE
Show details
10
Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learners’ processing of speech in noise ...
Gor, Kira. - : Digital Repository at the University of Maryland, 2014
BASE
Show details
11
Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learners’ processing of speech in noise
Gor, Kira. - : Frontiers, 2014
BASE
Show details
12
The word superiority effect in audiovisual speech perception
In: ISSN: 0167-6393 ; EISSN: 1872-7182 ; Speech Communication ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00476921 ; Speech Communication, Elsevier : North-Holland, 2010, 52 (6), pp.525-532. ⟨10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.005⟩ (2010)
BASE
Show details
13
Intelligibilité de la parole à plusieurs distances dans un bruit naturel
In: 10ème Congrès Français d'Acoustique ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00550902 ; 10ème Congrès Français d'Acoustique, Apr 2010, Lyon, France (2010)
BASE
Show details
14
Word-Recognition Performance in Interrupted Noise by Young Listeners With Normal Hearing and Older Listeners With Hearing Loss
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2010)
BASE
Show details
15
Binaural Speech Recognition in Noise and the Effect of Context
Fry, Anna. - : The Ohio State University, 2010
BASE
Show details
16
Effects of Bilingualism on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise
Carlo, Mitzarie A. - : Digital Commons @ University of South Florida, 2008
In: Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2008)
BASE
Show details
17
The Words-in-Noise (WIN) Test With Multitalker Babble and Speech-Spectrum Noise Maskers
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2007)
BASE
Show details
18
Use of 35 Words for Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Signal-to-Babble Ratio: A Clinic Protocol
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2005)
Abstract: Data from earlier studies that presented 70 words at 24 to 0 dB signal-to-babble (S/B) ratios indicated that most young listeners with normal hearing required 0 to 6 dB S/B ratios to attain 50% correct word recognition. Older listeners with hearing loss often required a >12 dB S/B ratio to attain 50% correct word recognition. In our study, we converted the Words in Noise test from one 70-word list into two 35-word lists for quicker administration by clinicians. Using baseline data from previous studies, we used two strategies to randomize the 35-word lists: based on recognition performance at each S/B ratio and based on recognition performance only. With the first randomization strategy, the 50% correct word-recognition points on the two lists differed by 0.5 dB for 72 listeners with hearing loss. With the second randomization strategy, 48 listeners with hearing loss performed identically on the two lists.
Keyword: aging; auditory perception; distortion; hearing aids; hearing loss; multitalker babble; signal-to-babble ratio; speech in noise; speech perception; word recognition
URL: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0009
https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/18557
BASE
Hide details
19
Speech Signals Used to Evaluate Functional Status of the Auditory System
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2005)
BASE
Show details
20
A Comparison of Word-Recognition Abilities Assessed With Digit Pairs and Digit Triplets in Multitalker Babble
In: ETSU Faculty Works (2005)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
20
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern