| 2 |
Cyborg werden: Möglichkeitshorizonte in feministischen Theorien und Science Fictions
|
|
Fink, Dagmar. - : transcript Verlag, 2022. : DEU, 2022. : Bielefeld, 2022
|
|
In: Gender Studies ; 291 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Natural cybernetics and mathematical history: the principle of least choice in history
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03315004 ; 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Imagining the thinking machine: Technological myths and the rise of artificial intelligence
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
A Measure of All Minds: A Classification of the Artificial Intelligence Strengths and Virtues & the Creation of the THETIS Dimensions of Cybernetic Wellbeing
|
|
|
|
In: Master of Applied Positive Psychology (MAPP) Capstone Projects (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Unique information via dependency constraints
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol 52, iss 1 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
|
|
|
|
In: Humanities ; Volume 8 ; Issue 1 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
|
|
Zetter, Nathaniel. - : MDPI AG, 2019. : https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/1/5, 2019. : Humanities, 2019
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Mathematics in Motion: Cartesian Mechanism and the Prospect of Intelligent Machines
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The mirror for (artificial) intelligence: Working in whose reflection?
|
|
Moore, Phoebe V.. - : Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), 2019
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Creativity and the cybernetics of self: Drama, embodied creation and feedback processes
|
|
|
|
In: Davis, S, (2018). Creativity and the cybernetics of self: Drama, embodied creation and feedback processes. Burgoyne, S (Ed.), Creativity in theatre: Theory and action in theatre/drama education, p. 169-187Cham, Switzerland: Springer http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_11 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Robert Smithson and Cybernetics: Language, Technology and Abstraction ... : Robert Smithson und Kybernetik: Sprache, Technologie und Abstraktion ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Just Talking -- Modelling Casual Conversation ; 19th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Silence and overlap in chat and chunk phases of multiparty casual conversation ; 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Polychronization as a mechanism for language acquisition in spiking neural networks
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Building Teacher Self-Efficacy Through Administrator Feedback
|
|
|
|
In: Dissertations (2018)
|
|
Abstract:
The study explored current site principals’ feedback practices that support or hinder teachers’ implementation of feedback, and identified site principal’s practices that encourage or interfere with teacher’s self-efficacy. Using qualitative interviews with site principals and teachers from two different districts and three different school sites, the study analyzed two major leadership practices: (a) an administrator’s ability to communicate effectively with teachers before, during, and after the feedback process, and (b) an administrator’s use of emotional intelligence when providing feedback. Data were separated into four feedback types (positive feedback, negative feedback, feedback and feedforward) and emotional intelligence traits (self-regulation, self-aware, empathy, social skills, and motivation). Comparative analyses were conducted amongst teachers at the same site to explore patterns and insights within and across sites. The results of this study indicated that site principals primarily provided positive feedback and positive feedforward and exuded some of the emotional intelligence traits when providing instructional feedback to teachers. Teachers also wanted their site principals in their classrooms giving instructional feedback more often and believed that the way in which their principal gave them feedback mattered. These findings suggest that collaborative opportunities with site principals on how to provide feedback to teachers more often is essential. Furthermore, principals should receive additional professional development opportunities targeting emotional intelligence and feedback types.
|
|
Keyword:
cybernetics; Educational administration; Educational evaluation; Educational leadership; emotional intelligence; feedback; site principals; systems; teachers
|
|
URL: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=etd_dissertations
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_dissertations/15
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Why the United States Must Adopt Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
The New Dogs of War: The Future of Weaponized Artificial Intelligence
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
