2 |
Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: A usage-based approach ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
A comparison of differential adpossessor flagging and differential argument flagging ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
A comparison of differential adpossessor flagging and differential argument flagging ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Explicit apprehensions, implicit instructions ; Explicit apprehensions, implicit instructions: An indirect speech act in the grammar
|
|
|
|
In: A typology of apprehensives ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03092513 ; Marine Vuillermet; Eva Schultze-Berndt. A typology of apprehensives, Language Science Press, In press, Studies in Diversity Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Teanu dictionary (Solomon Islands) ; https://dictionaria.clld.org/contributions/teanu
|
|
|
|
In: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03501928 ; 15, 2021, Dictionaria, Martin Haspelmath, Barbara Stiebels ; https://dictionaria.clld.org/contributions/teanu (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
From community competition to complementarity in general linguistics: The eight complementary why questions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
From community competition to complementarity in general linguistics: The eight complementary why questions ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this presentation, I first ask whether general linguists need to be organized in competing communities (functional linguists, structural linguists, generative linguists, cognitive linguists, etc.), and my tentative answer is no. Instead, linguists could think of their methodological choices as complementary. I suggest that this will be facilitated by recognizing that there are in fact eight different theoretical questions of general linguistics which are as complementary as Tinbergen's famous four why questions in biology. ...
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013852 https://zenodo.org/record/5013852
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
15 |
Structural, evolutionary and biocognitive explanations are mutually compatible ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Structural, evolutionary and biocognitive explanations are mutually compatible ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|