| 21 |
Predicting Declension Class from Form and Meaning
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 22 |
A Tale of a Probe and a Parser
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 23 |
Intrinsic Probing through Dimension Selection
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 24 |
Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 26 |
A Tale of a Probe and a Parser ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Measuring what linguistic information is encoded in neural models of language has become popular in NLP. Researchers approach this enterprise by training “probes”—supervised models designed to extract linguistic structure from another model’s output. One such probe is the structural probe (Hewitt and Manning, 2019), designed to quantify the extent to which syntactic information is encoded in contextualised word representations. The structural probe has a novel design, unattested in the parsing literature, the precise benefit of which is not immediately obvious. To explore whether syntactic probes would do better to make use of existing techniques, we compare the structural probe to a more traditional parser with an identical lightweight parameterisation. The parser outperforms structural probe on UUAS in seven of nine analysed languages, often by a substantial amount (e.g. by 11.1 points in English). Under a second less common metric, however, there is the opposite trend—the structural probe outperforms the ... : Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ...
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000462303
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/462303
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 28 |
Measuring the Similarity of Grammatical Gender Systems by Comparing Partitions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 30 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 31 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 32 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 33 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 34 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 35 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 36 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 37 |
On the Idiosyncrasies of the Mandarin Chinese Classifier System ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 39 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 40 |
Definiteness across languages
|
|
|
|
In: Language Science Press; (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
