1 |
Under-resourced or overloaded?:Rethinking working memory deficits in developmental language disorder
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Origins of dissociations in the English past tense:A synthetic brain imaging model
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Infants learn to follow gaze in stages:Evidence confirming a robotic prediction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Infants Learn to Follow Gaze in Stages: Evidence Confirming a Robotic Prediction
|
|
|
|
In: Open Mind (Camb) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Two-year old children preferentially transmit simple actions but not pedagogically demonstrated actions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Neurocomputational models capture the effect of learned labels on infants' object and category representations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Two-year-old children preferentially transmit simple actions but not pedagogically demonstrated actions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Building the foundations of language: mechanisms of curiosity-driven learning.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Learned labels shape pre-speech infants’ object representations
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Infants rapidly learn both linguistic and nonlinguistic representations of their environment and begin to link these from around 6 months. While there is an increasing body of evidence for the effect of labels heard in-task on infants' online processing, whether infants' learned linguistic representations shape learned nonlinguistic representations is unclear. In this study 10-month-old infants were trained over the course of a week with two 3D objects, one labeled, and one unlabeled. Infants then took part in a looking time task in which 2D images of the objects were presented individually in a silent familiarization phase, followed by a preferential looking trial. During the critical familiarization phase, infants looked for longer at the previously labeled stimulus than the unlabeled stimulus, suggesting that learning a label for an object had shaped infants' representations as indexed by looking times. We interpret these results in terms of label activation and novelty response accounts and discuss implications for our understanding of early representational development.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/86485/ https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12201
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
All the Right Noises:Background Variability Helps Early Word Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Computational Exploration of Lexical Development in Down Syndrome
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
The effect of shyness on children's formation and retention of novel word–object mappings
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|