| 1 |
Investigating the nature of infants' lexical speed of processing
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Contributions of Abstract Extratextual Talk and Interactive Style to Preschoolers’ Vocabulary Development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Social cognitive and later language acquisition
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
A great number of studies suggest that children’s acquisition of mental-state language supports, or even facilitates, their understanding of others’ mental states and perspectives. However, based on previous research, it has often been difficult to determine which aspects of mental-state language support this so-called Theory of Mind understanding. Whereas some researchers have argued that it is the semantics of mental verbs, such as think and know, others have suggested that it is the subordinate structure of complement-clause constructions, such as She thinks that the sticker is in the red box. In English, these two aspects are often confounded: mental verbs are typically used in complement-clause constructions. However, more recent studies have turned to languages such as Chinese and German, which allow us to distinguish between verbal semantics and syntactic constructions and also look at their interaction. Overall, these studies suggest that both semantics and syntax can play a role in children’s Theory of Mind development. In this chapter I also present some findings that indicate that whether or not the semantics of mental verbs supports children’s Theory of Mind development depends on how exactly they are used in complement-clause constructions. Since these usage patterns differ across languages, we can also see cross-linguistic differences in the interaction between verbal semantics, syntactic patterns and Theory of Mind development.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/147267/1/Brandt_2020_accepted.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.27.07bra
https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/147267/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Improving the robustness of infant lexical processing speed measures
|
|
|
|
In: Behav Res Methods (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
The Impact of Interactive Shared Book Reading on Children's Language Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Story choice matters for caregiver extra-textual talk during shared reading with preschoolers.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Developmental psycholinguistics teaches us that we need multi-method, not single-method, approaches to the study of linguistic representation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Combining Language Corpora With Experimental and Computational Approaches for Language Acquisition Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Diversity not quantity in caregiver speech: Using computational modeling to isolate the effects of the quantity and the diversity of the input on vocabulary growth
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Combining Language Corpora With Experimental and Computational Approaches for Language Acquisition Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
How do infants use nonadjacent dependencies during language development?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Child Language (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Child Language (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Is Passive Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From Adult Grammaticality Judgment and Comprehension Studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
