1 |
Relative clauses in child heritage speakers of Turkish in the United States
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Sources of variability in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Turkish heritage language children in the United States
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Spanish pragmatic markers' usage patterns in second language and heritage speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The effect of full-immersion schooling on nativelikeness and dominance in Palestinian Arabic-American English bilinguals
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Effects of instruction on writing improvement of university heritage learners of Spanish: A longitudinal study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The effects of language instruction on L2 learners’ input processing and learning outcomes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Vulnerability and stability of Differential Object Marking in Romanian heritage speakers
|
|
|
|
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 5, No 1 (2020); 119 ; 2397-1835 (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Differential Object Marking (DOM) marks some objects overtly with specific morphology and is regulated by several semantic and pragmatic factors. DOM exhibits synchronic and diachronic variability within and across languages, especially in bilingual contexts, and the study of heritage languages offers a unique perspective on the forces that shape it. This study investigates knowledge of DOM in Romanian and its interaction with accusative clitic doubling (CD) in native speakers of Romanian in Romania and first- and second-generation Romanian immigrants to the United States. The results of an oral production task, a written production task, and a written and auditory comprehension task show convergence between the adult immigrant group and the Romanians in the homeland. When divergent uses of DOM and accusative clitic omission occurred, these were mostly produced by the heritage speakers with early onset of bilingualism, consistent with findings of age effects in heritage language acquisition and a Differential Access Model of heritage language grammars. We discuss these results in the contexts of DOM vulnerability in other heritage languages, such as Spanish, and consider why DOM in Romanian might be comparatively better preserved by the adult immigrants and heritage speakers.
|
|
Keyword:
bilingualism; clitic doubling; comprehension; differential access; differential object marking; experimental linguistics; heritage speakers; production; Romanian; syntax-semantics
|
|
URL: https://www.glossa-journal.org/jms/article/view/1135 https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1135
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
8 |
Tracing language variation in Spanish: A multidisciplinary approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The acquisition of Mandarin by heritage speakers and second language learners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Interpretation and processing of overt pronouns in Korean, English and L2-acquisition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The influence of task factors and language background on morphological processing in Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Comprehension of Spanish relative and passive clauses by early bilinguals and second language learners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Why wait? Psycholinguistic investigations of the roles of learning condition and gender stability in L2 gender-based anticipation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Differential object marking in Basque: grammaticalization, attitudes and ideological representations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|