| 1 |
‘Making the most of together time’: development of a Health Visitor–led intervention to support children’s early language and communication development at the 2–2½-year-old review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
‘Making the most of together time’: development of a Health Visitor–led intervention to support children’s early language and communication development at the 2–2½-year-old review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
‘Making the most of together time’: development of a Health Visitor–led intervention to support children’s early language and communication development at the 2–2½-year-old review
|
|
|
|
In: Pilot Feasibility Stud (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Universal language development screening: comparative performance of two questionnaires
|
|
|
|
In: BMJ Paediatr Open (2022)
|
|
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low language ability in early childhood is a strong predictor of later psychopathology as well as reduced school readiness, lower educational attainment, employment problems and involvement with the criminal justice system. Assessment of early language development is universally offered in many countries, but there has been little evaluation of assessment tools. We planned to compare the screening performance of two commonly used language assessment instruments. METHODS: A pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study was carried out in five areas of England comparing the performance of two screening tools (Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) and Sure Start Language Measure (SSLM)) against a reference test (Preschool Language Scale, 5th edition). RESULTS: Results were available for 357 children aged 23–30 months. The ASQ Communication Scale using optimal cut-off values had a sensitivity of 0.55, a specificity of 0.95 and positive and negative predictive values of 0.53 and 0.95, respectively. The SSLM had corresponding values of 0.83, 0.81, 0.33 and 0.98, respectively. Both screening tools performed relatively poorly in families not using English exclusively in the home. CONCLUSION: The very widely used ASQ Communication Scale performs poorly as a language screening tool, missing over one-third of cases of low language ability. The SSLM performed better as a screening tool.
|
|
Keyword:
Screening
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001324
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8739429/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Testing the association between the early parent–child relationship and teacher reported socio-emotional difficulties at 11 years: A quantile mediation analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Patterns of peer interaction in multimodal L2 digital social reading
|
|
Law, James; Barny, David; Poulin, Rachel. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2020. : Center for Language & Technology, 2020. : (co-sponsored by Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, University of Texas at Austin), 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The Emergence of Inner Speech and Its Measurement in Atypically Developing Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Teachers observing classroom communication: An application of the Communicating Supporting Classroom Observation Tool for children aged 4–7 years ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Teachers observing classroom communication: An application of the Communicating Supporting Classroom Observation Tool for children aged 4–7 years ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Data resource profile: the Child LAnguage REpository (CLARE)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Data resource profile: The Child LAnguage REpository (CLARE)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Early home activities and oral language skills in middle childhood: a quantile analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Home-Start early speech and language study: Phase 1 evaluation report
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Association of proximal elements of social disadvantage with children's language development at 2 years: an analysis of data from the Children in Focus (CiF) sample from the ALSPAC birth cohort
|
|
|
|
In: pissn: 1368-2822 ; eissn: 1460-6984 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
