1 |
Interactive query expansion for professional search applications ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
ur-iw-hnt at GermEval 2021: An Ensembling Strategy with Multiple BERT Models ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
University of Regensburg @ SwissText 2021 SEPP-NLG: Adding Sentence Structure to Unpunctuated Text
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Crowdsourcing and Aggregating Nested Markable Annotations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Crowdsourcing and Aggregating Nested Markable Annotations
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
One of the key steps in language resource creation is the identification of the text segments to be annotated, or markables, which depending on the task may vary from nominal chunks for named entity resolution to (potentially nested) noun phrases in coreference resolution (or mentions) to larger text segments in text segmentation. Markable identification is typically carried out semi-automatically, by running a markable identifier and correcting its output by hand–which is increasingly done via annotators recruited through crowdsourcing and aggregating their responses. In this paper, we present a method for identifying markables for coreference annotation that combines high-performance automatic markable detectors with checking with a Game-With-A-Purpose (GWAP) and aggregation using a Bayesian annotation model. The method was evaluated both on news data and data from a variety of other genres and results in an improvement on F1 of mention boundaries of over seven percentage points when compared with a state-of-the-art, domain-independent automatic mention detector, and almost three points over an in-domain mention detector. One of the key contributions of our proposal is its applicability to the case in which markables are nested, as is the case with coreference markables; but the GWAP and several of the proposed markable detectors are task and language-independent and are thus applicable to a variety of other annotation scenarios.
|
|
URL: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/25793/ http://repository.essex.ac.uk/25793/1/Madge2019Crowdsourcing.pdf https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1077
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
8 |
A Crowdsourced Corpus of Multiple Judgments and Disagreement on Anaphoric Interpretation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
A Crowdsourced Corpus of Multiple Judgments and Disagreement on Anaphoric Interpretation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Exploring Language Style in Chatbots to Increase Perceived Product Value and User Engagement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A Probabilistic Annotation Model for Crowdsourcing Coreference
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
MultiLing 2015: Multilingual Summarization of Single and Multi-Documents, On-line Fora, and Call-center Conversations
|
|
|
|
In: Sigdial ; https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01194230 ; Sigdial, 2015, Unknown, Unknown Region (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Creating language resources for under-resourced languages:methodologies, and experiments with Arabic
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Creating language resources for under-resourced languages: methodologies, and experiments with Arabic
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|