DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 21 – 29 of 29

21
Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension
BASE
Show details
22
Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension
Ito, Aine; Ferguson, Heather J.; Rueschmeyer, Shirley-Ann. - : eLife Sciences Publications, 2018
BASE
Show details
23
Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension
Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, Sarah; Ito, Aine; Segaert, Katrien. - : eLife Sciences Publications, 2018
BASE
Show details
24
Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension
Nieuwland, Mante S; Politzer-Ahles, Stephen; Heyselaar, Evelien. - : eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd, 2018
BASE
Show details
25
Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension
Nieuwland, Mante S; Ito, Aine; Segaert, Katrien. - : eLife Sciences Publications, 2018
BASE
Show details
26
How robust are effects of semantic and phonological prediction during language comprehension? A visual world eye-tracking study. ...
Ito, Aine; Husband, Edward Matthew. - : Unpublished, 2017
BASE
Show details
27
Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: A rebuttal to DeLong, Urbach & Kutas (2017) ...
Ito, Aine; Martin, Andrea; Nieuwland, Mante. - : PsyArXiv, 2017
Abstract: In our recent publication “How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects” (Ito, Martin, & Nieuwland, 2016a), we report two experiments which failed to replicate existing ERP evidence for prediction as reported in C. D. Martin et al. (2013), whose study resembled DeLong, Urbach, and Kutas (2005; from hereon DUK05). DeLong, Urbach, and Kutas (2017; from hereon, DUK17) recently published a commentary which depicts our publication as a case of poor scholarship that makes “no substantive contribution to the literature on what factors may matter for prediction and when.” DUK17 warn that the readers of our work “will be led into serious error.” In this rebuttal, we first present evidence that is inconsistent with the arguments of DUK17 regarding our own experiments, and then we briefly discuss other indications why it might be hard to observe and thus replicate the a/an prediction effect. ...
Keyword: FOS Languages and literature; FOS Psychology; Linguistics; Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics; Psychology; Social and Behavioral Sciences
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ayd3t
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ayd3t
BASE
Hide details
28
Prediction during native and non-native language comprehension: the role of mediating factors
Ito, Aine. - : The University of Edinburgh, 2016
BASE
Show details
29
Looking at mouse when you predict "mouth" : Evidence for phonological prediction. ...
Ito, Aine; Pickering, Martin; Corley, Martin. - : Unpublished, 2015
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
28
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern