1 |
The Rhyme Inhibition Task: How Competing Phonological and Semantic Cues Influence Language Production ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Sentence Repetition as a measure of language knowledge in Greek-Albanian TD and DLD bilingual children ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Call for Papers: 13th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL13) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Classifier learning and modality in a polyglot savant
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/g.morgan/classifiers in polyglot savant.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Language against the Odds -- The learning of British Sign Language by a polyglot savant
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/neil/lodds.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Kanda University of International Studies: Graduate School of Language Sciences, Tokyo (21.10.2007), at the FORELL research group
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.enl.auth.gr/symposium18/papers/2_HAEGEMAN.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
Abstract: English adverbial clauses are incompatible with argument fronting (1a) (Haegeman 2006) and with markers of epistemic modality (1b) (1) a *When this book I find, I will buy it. b *I will come when it may be warmer. c When on Friday he had not arrived, I called him. I will first review an earlier analysis (Haegeman 2003 etc.) of these data in which I related the absence of topicalisation in adverbial clauses directly to the absence of illocutionary force, as encoded by a functional head, 'Force' (Rizzi 1997). I will show that this analysis poses a range of theoretical and empirical problems. In the main body of the paper I will propose an alternative analysis according to which the absence of topicalisation in adverbial clauses such as (i) the fact that a sub-set of adverbial clauses in English are compatible with topicalisation and with markers of epistemic modality (Haegeman 2006); (ii) the fact that adverbial clauses are more easily compatible with clitic left dislocation in Romance; (iii) the fact that among adverbial clauses in French a distinction is to be found between those that licence stylistic inversion of the subject without requiring any additional trigger and those that require a specific trigger for stylistic inversion (Lahousse 2003(Lahousse , 2005.
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1037.2845 http://www.enl.auth.gr/symposium18/papers/2_HAEGEMAN.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|