DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...13
Hits 41 – 60 of 255

41
Sympathy for the devil? A defence of EAP
Hyland, Ken. - 2018
BASE
Show details
42
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Zhe (Victor); Hyland, Ken. - 2018
BASE
Show details
43
Social learning analytics in online language learning: Challenges and future directions
BASE
Show details
44
Is academic writing becoming more informal?
Hyland, Ken; Jiang, Feng (Kevin). - 2017
BASE
Show details
45
Learning to write for academic purposes:Specificity and second language writing
Hyland, Ken. - : Taylor and Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
46
Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves
Jiang, Feng (Kevin); Hyland, Ken. - 2017
BASE
Show details
47
Faces of English Education:Students, Teachers, and Pedagogy
Wong, Lillian L.C.; Hyland, Ken. - : Taylor and Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
48
Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?
Hyland, Ken. - 2017
BASE
Show details
49
Intervention and revision: Expertise and interaction in text mediation
Luo, Na; Hyland, Ken. - 2017
BASE
Show details
50
What is technicality? A Technicality Analysis Model for EAP vocabulary
BASE
Show details
51
The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes
Hyland, Ken; Shaw, Philip. - : Routledge, 2016
BASE
Show details
52
General and Specific EAP
Hyland, Ken. - : Routledge, 2016
BASE
Show details
53
Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance
Hyland, Ken; Jiang, Feng (Kevin). - 2016
BASE
Show details
54
“We must conclude that…”:A diachronic study of academic engagement
Hyland, Ken; Jiang, Feng (Kevin). - 2016
Abstract: Engagement is the way that writers explicitly acknowledge the presence of their readers in a text, drawing them in through readermention, personal asides, appeals to shared knowledge, questions and directives. This is a key rhetorical feature of academic writing and has been a topic of interest to applied linguists for over 20 years. Despite this interest, however, very little is known of how it has changed in recent years and whether such changes have occurred across different disciplines. Are academic texts becoming more interactional and if so in what ways and in what fields? Drawing on a corpus of 2.2 million words taken from the top five journals in each of four disciplines at three distinct time periods, we look for answers to these questions to determine whether reader engagement has changed in academic writing over the past 50 years. Our paper presents, and attempts to account for, some surprising variations and an overall decline in explicit engagement during this period.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/65919/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf
https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/65919/
BASE
Hide details
55
A very peculiar practice
Hyland, Ken. - : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2016
BASE
Show details
56
Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice
Hyland, Ken. - 2016
BASE
Show details
57
Chinese academics writing for publication:English teachers as text mediators
Luo, Na; Hyland, Ken. - 2016
BASE
Show details
58
Methods and methodologies in second language writing research
Hyland, Ken. - 2016
BASE
Show details
59
Researching Writing
In: Research methods in applied linguistics : a practical resource (2015), S. 335-348
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
60
Corpora and written academic English
Hyland, Ken. - : Cambridge University Press, 2015
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...13

Catalogues
20
2
37
0
4
0
1
Bibliographies
67
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
145
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern